|
|
In my opinion, it is accessible.$ ^+ n; |( e1 s- C! z
firstly, there is no defenity about anchorage in 60598-1, 1 V# G9 Z/ J$ \5 q! X. l' q9 V
secondly, specified as
- g/ D. w6 f! m- E"Glands shall not be used as cord anchorages in portable or adjustable luminaires, unless they
9 S* Z# f3 e/ ]# F6 shave provision for clamping all types and sizes of cables and cords which might be used for the
1 H o: r/ u0 I# T+ e2 F. u. Y" Asupply connection. Anchorages of labyrinth type may be used if it is evident from the design or
/ v9 E5 W, r; V, d( P: Rby means of suitable marking how the flexible cable or cord is to be mounted." 5 Q% `" \; A. e0 Y! V- ~
so if it could pass the test for cord anchorage, why not use it ?
- c$ F/ c* W0 @5 }$ g; Xand i have handled some road lamp cases like this applied CQC. |
|