|
|
In my opinion, it is accessible.8 x" [# f2 ~* ~* V0 L6 j/ i3 j* c! _
firstly, there is no defenity about anchorage in 60598-1,
3 H) z4 [( v) E) ?secondly, specified as( n" k& w( @1 F
"Glands shall not be used as cord anchorages in portable or adjustable luminaires, unless they
% z$ t) H4 q- h3 y3 i' ] ^have provision for clamping all types and sizes of cables and cords which might be used for the
# k; ]- W4 g- }' {% d \' X% a! Ksupply connection. Anchorages of labyrinth type may be used if it is evident from the design or
% i3 B% }# z3 F/ ]9 s; Vby means of suitable marking how the flexible cable or cord is to be mounted." " x2 v3 c) _" {; {# @7 w
so if it could pass the test for cord anchorage, why not use it ?
' J+ x( u- w# k* E) q# `8 @1 f! |and i have handled some road lamp cases like this applied CQC. |
|