|
|
In my opinion, it is accessible.; \" G" w! K( r8 }
firstly, there is no defenity about anchorage in 60598-1, ( E# d) X. q* b& N7 a+ Q
secondly, specified as6 v" n& Q* h, T0 M: X
"Glands shall not be used as cord anchorages in portable or adjustable luminaires, unless they# x" {3 {$ _, O" _6 y
have provision for clamping all types and sizes of cables and cords which might be used for the
7 G% Q8 p7 f1 e0 Q* l$ t0 qsupply connection. Anchorages of labyrinth type may be used if it is evident from the design or" _' h) `) B/ N# ?
by means of suitable marking how the flexible cable or cord is to be mounted." 9 x* D; [; C2 P4 y0 N) ` M5 C, ?
so if it could pass the test for cord anchorage, why not use it ?# g0 O0 M% u, o( K; q, ~
and i have handled some road lamp cases like this applied CQC. |
|