|
|
In my opinion, it is accessible.
3 N# b# }. z( H3 G" Y+ M) Ufirstly, there is no defenity about anchorage in 60598-1, 5 j) H! }/ R% e: v9 Q
secondly, specified as
8 x% I7 Z3 S; U"Glands shall not be used as cord anchorages in portable or adjustable luminaires, unless they
' U4 e" O* {% p2 c- d8 a" u7 y" bhave provision for clamping all types and sizes of cables and cords which might be used for the6 r/ E# k% g1 y( o$ z S* W/ a
supply connection. Anchorages of labyrinth type may be used if it is evident from the design or
: U+ W I1 d- ~ F \' T( oby means of suitable marking how the flexible cable or cord is to be mounted."
$ c7 i/ E" \% b( ^, N; N& R( E7 ?so if it could pass the test for cord anchorage, why not use it ?
( [0 _* U3 x3 y: O) X! Sand i have handled some road lamp cases like this applied CQC. |
|