|
|
In my opinion, it is accessible.4 V6 a9 o; p1 A' \; ~4 h% M, W7 F
firstly, there is no defenity about anchorage in 60598-1,
& V z- W$ G% o1 u0 |secondly, specified as3 n9 t+ e- ?* H" ^. M6 L
"Glands shall not be used as cord anchorages in portable or adjustable luminaires, unless they
+ E$ U6 K$ `% ^+ P5 Khave provision for clamping all types and sizes of cables and cords which might be used for the
& s4 ^( \& n9 B# hsupply connection. Anchorages of labyrinth type may be used if it is evident from the design or* |) l- G/ @$ K7 `& V( _. a! k
by means of suitable marking how the flexible cable or cord is to be mounted." 9 y$ t1 w4 k8 B i" Y
so if it could pass the test for cord anchorage, why not use it ?0 I. O$ v' j8 Q% P+ y0 J7 i
and i have handled some road lamp cases like this applied CQC. |
|