|
|

楼主 |
发表于 2014-11-11 18:51
|
显示全部楼层
jiayou 发表于 2014-11-1 14:04 5 Z; c R& V _) |' t
EN 60335-1 clause 29.1 or 29.2, 你们这个产品做class I 还是做class II 的?看这个构造潜在的电击隐患蛮多 ... 6 c# _' \0 ~1 G `! Y" w- G: A
多谢指教; c& Q6 G* k7 S% b K% k
但有点疑问,如果按29.1和29.2判断, 60335标准里只是要求对裸露的导线施加2N的力来确定会不会减小电气间隙和爬电距离。好像并没要求对带绝缘的线施加2N的力。
* b$ j. m1 o: c g) OA force is applied to bare conductors, other than those of heating elements, and accessible ) b! w0 ]6 O0 S3 s0 g
surfacesto try to reduce clearances when making the measurement. The force is
* e3 m9 R9 ?4 s$ q% s2 d% e, ]– 2 N, for bare conductors;
8 u6 N, a6 G& Y2 n4 y$ }$ }) P' ]7 ?– 30 N, for accessible surfaces. |
|