|
|
In my opinion, it is accessible.
$ s5 s8 W: c; @" k) a+ x4 d! P3 e# dfirstly, there is no defenity about anchorage in 60598-1,
; i# d0 b V+ t2 M3 _# hsecondly, specified as
- k9 r9 j* z' q, B& _! l8 Z"Glands shall not be used as cord anchorages in portable or adjustable luminaires, unless they
. g9 t& T' f2 y& P0 t: f# X+ Ehave provision for clamping all types and sizes of cables and cords which might be used for the% B/ C* A* Z' y8 |4 l& y1 H
supply connection. Anchorages of labyrinth type may be used if it is evident from the design or% n2 `3 G6 c$ ?/ Z! K
by means of suitable marking how the flexible cable or cord is to be mounted." 8 D# ~. T: i$ }# N/ `
so if it could pass the test for cord anchorage, why not use it ?
# n+ j( W% @2 x2 Kand i have handled some road lamp cases like this applied CQC. |
|