|
本帖最后由 小米 于 2012-9-12 15:38 编辑
, ^- b* D6 }4 Z5 m8 Y7 q1 {! n' X% ~8 P( r: C9 ]( Z1 k
| DSH 442 | Interpretation of “in close proximity" or “within a distance of 3 mm"3 J/ r# S5 c* O! n
| 30.21 x: e8 }; ~: f
| 60335-1(ed.3)
0 F6 y2 l' ]0 P: H |
2 Z/ L6 _) t5 T. B5 @6 [; Y( f8 l% m) J I# Z) \
Standard: IEC60335-1:1991, 3rd Ed, Z5 V; n; q% q; Y
Sub clause: 30.2. e, w3 l" M j
Sheet No.: DSH-442' L! b7 F9 _8 t, D9 h+ N- m
Subject: Interpretation of “in close proximity" or “within a distance of 3 mm"
* d& x) ^* W8 j) y, TKey words: -close proximity - within a distance of 3 mm
; H2 m9 o& Y1 l& L' `. e$ b* rDecision taken at the 40th CTL meeting 2003.
9 @2 s( [5 m6 u7 c8 B8 _8 yQuestion:
/ d0 o- G h( ]* d5 a# gIn the note of sub-clause of 30.2.2 of IEC60335-1:1991, 3rd Ed. , "In close proximity" is6 {) J3 i" l ]! p: Q+ h( _
considered to be a distance not exceeding 3 mm. Some say the distance means clearance or" g; b+ t. L+ ~' S
Creepage distance and the others say it means shortest distance regardless of any non-metallic# s% M+ P7 U* Z" y: N+ O
materials between them. How should it be interpreted?
5 K/ O0 X5 Z8 N, z7 F% _+ O
. R$ g) K4 j9 e) v X) F9 ^7 P- x( [" {; P$ ^* r
9 D: q: V" b* m7 z
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|