|
本帖最后由 小米 于 2012-9-12 15:38 编辑
2 Q" M1 _1 W6 P( ]" @- M2 u1 E. D: t h: S) k
| DSH 442 | Interpretation of “in close proximity" or “within a distance of 3 mm"
9 q5 B4 m# g7 }7 {" R | 30.24 J w$ j1 I5 K7 r
| 60335-1(ed.3)
; E# h% \6 ?/ w2 b0 y# l2 H | 4 B8 ~2 T1 g( |
" i$ {2 J( V. Q, X, X5 f# S, nStandard: IEC60335-1:1991, 3rd Ed2 R$ p. X/ x4 M7 z: W) a+ Y
Sub clause: 30.2
+ |: x* J$ l% zSheet No.: DSH-442
' D+ P+ g# n1 o; I q7 vSubject: Interpretation of “in close proximity" or “within a distance of 3 mm"% a' {+ w- P6 Y! {
Key words: -close proximity - within a distance of 3 mm. P, n3 Z5 x: ?- x# X5 k
Decision taken at the 40th CTL meeting 2003.
5 g1 p/ y3 A' D3 Q1 s$ D* SQuestion:
! p s) I: m4 ZIn the note of sub-clause of 30.2.2 of IEC60335-1:1991, 3rd Ed. , "In close proximity" is6 a& `5 E$ t: F2 d7 ~
considered to be a distance not exceeding 3 mm. Some say the distance means clearance or* E- z Z4 f6 ]- H1 a4 l0 `5 [
Creepage distance and the others say it means shortest distance regardless of any non-metallic
8 w9 w0 }! a( }& b# Dmaterials between them. How should it be interpreted?
, I$ I: n* l/ I: k5 V( }5 @/ _! k! _/ Y, b
5 B# l* T9 F7 J3 B
6 {$ u$ j! h% ~- s3 K1 v |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|