|
这个测试没做过,看了一下标准,其判断的依据在NAC.4 Compliance中有提到。5 B! @* d6 e3 P$ D+ L
NAC.4 Compliance4 G5 F6 @6 i' G5 j0 ]
In addition to the compliance criteria specified for the wire simulator and current probe,
& z5 {. F8 ?. d# r6 acompliance is checked by all of the following:! r* {! ], N4 t6 p" h: T' s
a) There shall be no ignition or charring of the cheesecloth indicator. Charring is
4 o! z r9 q6 E0 J8 Q3 Y2 fdeemed to have occurred when threads have been reduced to char by a glowing or
, Z. w: T* F* s$ dflaming condition.; ?. @9 A: X7 j: W4 c2 T4 v8 l
b) After the completion of each overvoltage test, the equipment under test shall8 E( a' P4 y* N5 F
continue to comply with the requirements in 6.2.& u7 ]7 a. K2 f8 T" |, c, g2 n+ ^
\% f& W) O" F2 k) c3 V8 [* hNOTE In many cases, it will be obvious from the results of the tests that compliance with one or more of these clauses has not been, H% q1 D. r% i/ |% F" _
affected by the applied potentials. Where there is doubt or where continued compliance cannot be determined, the appropriate tests in- _6 } v+ o) S d$ u6 M3 U% m& }
these clauses might need to be repeated.* u/ |& b6 F9 N8 c
做这个测试是不是需要盖一层棉布,棉布不能燃烧,不能碳化,纠结就出在碳化这里,因为这句话- e+ b$ R( J. Q! U' V. Q
Charring is deemed to have occurred when threads have been reduced to char by a glowing or$ k: T0 k9 J' T$ m( g4 j7 s% k+ \
flaming condition. 不好理解,我的理解是,细线因为发热或燃烧变成碳就认为棉布碳化已经发生。不知道你板上那条很细的PCB断开情况是什么样的? |
|