|
产品:儿童用骑钉书;2 Y1 W+ r K. @! X6 E
适用年龄:All ages
) {: b6 f0 k( L4 ~0 o a出口地区:欧洲& u- y, }0 }8 q8 I# U
赞成方:国内的ITS和SGS测试机构以及国内其它的第三方检测机构
( r9 E5 y0 w- k: h u; k EN71:0-3岁不合格,理由:要对内文进行拉力测试;
; W, h" b6 o& m, j4 r* } 3+合格,理由:接受状态无可触及的尖点,不用做拉力测试。8 A; ^+ [, G. d9 Q" M# ]5 k
1 i! S6 F5 e! r$ I反对方:UK Intertek4 I- Q, t D# ~# T8 q( w8 w
理由:1)只要在接受状态骑马钉尖端不可触及或者平行于骑钉书的长度,都可以接受,pass。
7 ~/ S6 v8 l' w. o4 x 2)既然纸张在EN71-1 Section 5.1规定是豁免的,为什么还要对书页进行拉力测试?这种判断是对标准的不正确理解。, d" W5 m: g/ N/ M+ |
: ^# E4 [. L& o; v* v1) As long as the staples/ wires are grippable and laying flat with no sharp or protruding points it will pass I think this is the 5.1 b test result .
4 E" g( V: s! l" _( i) S1 g$ @1 P) P, F; h8 G/ x. N8 }
2) They do not understand why Intertek Shenzhen have pulled the pages out of the book – this will of course give a fail for sharp points but that is not how you test this.
7 l& R: q: ~/ }) e$ D. N6 d2 Q3 a2 \2 a1 ]* O. A3 f3 a/ Y: R
3) Finally they have pointed out that books and paper are exempt from Use and Abuse tests generally so they think again a wrong test standard has been applied causing a fail.& |1 T0 W, `, `; i& E- s/ [* G
3 {: m. M' {0 @5 M$ m3 y8 @
' J% y1 R4 n4 o# ?0 I# }$ M& j1 y大家有何看法??? |
|