|
引用第8楼milighost于2009-10-27 12:50发表的 :( q" Z8 ]. [2 T* J* \2 [ F
. F# i* _: @+ p- u6 y这样做看着是万全了,但是成本也无形增加了。而且说实话,目前基于老的协调标准证书颁发的2006/42/EC证书,实际上并没有什么本质工作。这样的证书并没有什么实际的意义。
$ f& u1 W2 C+ c/ ]3 Q$ _) iPlease make sure that your words won't mislead the manufacturers.
: r; R* }3 X0 _! x6 j$ A0 |
% D1 k/ ?2 O7 c! F# sIt's illegal to issue a certificate acc. to 2006/42/EC applying the old harmonized standards.
0 s% _+ ]8 Z9 t
0 \0 P _8 S8 ?9 a& I' e8 ~4 bI strongly recommend that you had better check out the official FAQ regarding the new machinery directive.
0 F% O; N; a# M% N* U# S- A; l3 H4 L+ ^+ Z4 b
You have to wait for the coming updated harmonized standards under 2006/42/EC. Or you can just apply the Annex I of 2006/42/EC for the purpose of issuing a certificate of new machinery directive.9 N8 R' T2 `( z3 g
+ V3 F- O, x$ f. `Oh, yes. The cost is getting increased.
+ T( L8 @2 O% v, t8 D# I6 h! C P$ D( q: t2 Y. Y
But, for the long term, the cost is actually decreased considering the new requirement of the new harmonized standards.: h1 Q$ L: j- ?0 g
, B @8 p' B" Y# i
Most of the harmonized standards about industrial machines have a reference with ISO 13849. % u4 q' e- C8 {4 I
* \6 P/ }& ]4 pThat's a real problem, babe!/ i, e. [5 I% ~8 A d0 U
) [, \, _3 U* ^1 U8 u) K% @Don't tell me that you haven't read the standard yet.
9 Q$ k3 p' m" b# ~# f
6 V+ l# }( p" E$ G. fAnd don't tell me that you had thought that there is not any additional work on it.
8 g( h/ ^* G, g% Z. H& @' ?* O0 o
) z& t0 W# S: Q$ d+ A2 kThe manufacturers apply for a new certificate acc. to 2006/42/EC without using new harmonized standards before the end of this year./ `0 W4 G) \$ W% ]
To some degrees, the manufacturers can avoid the big problem. |
|