|
ylgc123 发表于 2018-10-29 09:30
; ?$ N- @' K, Y我去看了下OSM431决议,决议上的2个案例图片和楼主图中显示的还是有差异的。/ g+ Q- F# {& U' D
6 `6 x6 ~7 `3 D# D8 L) T" T
另外就目前看来决议上案 ...
+ `" G# U4 [+ z# r- p* Y再翻了一下60335-1/ A1:2013的clause 25.13
+ y+ n O2 \6 ?) w
1 s$ i4 e# r$ G' Z25.13 In the requirement, replace the second sentence by the following:! u( {( A8 t0 C# a- U
If it is not evident from the construction of the appliance that the supply cord can be( D. A. C& X2 R7 |2 G$ h/ p3 B
introduced without risk of damage, a non-detachable lining or non-detachable bushing& t( I* }1 T; m& ~" i4 t6 d
shall be provided that complies with 29.3 for supplementary insulation.. n( Q1 n5 K, G0 K3 n% V# `, A2 R
1 y0 r+ K& a* m U, p- ~3 ]8 j5 I
己经把金属进线口给改过来了,所以OSM431的决议也就成为过去式了。变成了圆滑的金属进线口都没问了题。 |
|