|
ylgc123 发表于 2018-10-29 09:30
* q3 k' j, u6 f1 ]我去看了下OSM431决议,决议上的2个案例图片和楼主图中显示的还是有差异的。
9 e' ]9 E8 d( m @1 r1 t: E9 P$ |4 q! }! d9 y# [: Z
另外就目前看来决议上案 ... ! Z+ S7 m, ]) C$ R6 R3 [: y Y" j
再翻了一下60335-1/ A1:2013的clause 25.13) q& N+ }# U8 [* g$ i
! u8 \2 ]1 X/ V" P; Z25.13 In the requirement, replace the second sentence by the following:
9 W4 m* d; D* q7 AIf it is not evident from the construction of the appliance that the supply cord can be
v5 K- Z4 H, S" a% gintroduced without risk of damage, a non-detachable lining or non-detachable bushing
: y# Y9 t. ~4 `+ P) Z: c/ O, P/ E, Cshall be provided that complies with 29.3 for supplementary insulation.
: B% F7 \1 g0 N% w1 w& ]1 Z
. P% g, e2 G6 G! M己经把金属进线口给改过来了,所以OSM431的决议也就成为过去式了。变成了圆滑的金属进线口都没问了题。 |
|