|
|
本帖最后由 terry20120318 于 2012-11-27 16:56 编辑
1 _' h+ F( b: a1 @7 S, p; C. {% Z
) b' t5 s5 M& R7 U; [1 w! L
6 X! Z9 [8 K7 {5 @5 ?7 s% i8 S! G9 {
; T( L2 ^; B1 i( B5 @Question:
$ G w2 l/ {1 I/ \: U& o. THow a product should be marked and/or classified when it consists of a set of:
/ _! H" P, w# {1 i# S9 M$ m1. An independent control gear (Class I or Class II) with SELV output
. W3 e0 _6 C( B4 u6 U: [and
* E' i* r" `! K& M2. A luminaire (one or more) which is detachable from the control gear (by hand)?
; ~" _ m" t. y/ O6 h! HDecision:
1 C* X0 s0 {$ r4 u; }- H- The independent control gear shall be classified as Class I or Class II;% V3 `- N/ Q4 M
- The luminaire shall be marked as Class III;4 k0 l2 y! W7 L0 e
- The whole product may be marked as Class I or Class II on the package. Another way is to mark! }4 v( h ?2 h# s4 E
the package with the rated voltages of the control gear and the luminaire. Class III marking on the
9 X8 c) |5 l, n+ l4 K! I# ypackage may be misleading, and if applied alone, the marking will be incorrect;
: c7 A) P6 W- A2 b- The control gear shall be tested according to Class I or Class II and the luminaire according to' i) y! Y" {& q/ K5 q5 c" |6 `
Class III.8 a i) w. _9 a5 S7 J) Y
Explanatory Notes:2 `+ Q; t* E. y7 N$ J7 }
8 j7 X0 d! H% f/ @$ \
) j0 @3 a S$ y9 \% \0 Y a6 h9 L
各位前辈，请教下此份决议, E4 }( p, l: w1 K, |
从决议看，认证时可以出一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书，然后放在一个包装箱内出货，是这个意思吧，没有讲一定要按整体做一个二类灯具的证书，只是包装箱上做标示即可。: ]7 P4 o5 A6 G2 g
如果是的话，分开出证，有利于公司 以后更换电源供应商。7 ]* i) t! J- r. i! q! V
第二，一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书，放在一个包装箱内出货，欧洲海关会不会认为有问题， G& p7 n' A. i; k8 `7 F
2 l5 X6 d# B5 c
多谢回复: l9 b; @' `: c4 @
- m3 k) c J5 c: i! C
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册安规
x
|
/1 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-11-27 09:35
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡
楼主