|
本帖最后由 terry20120318 于 2012-11-27 16:56 编辑
; S! ^) F2 ^3 g0 {* O. n) ]7 q9 F+ T ?& W e
# V* A2 M6 Z7 s( B
: i& s. f2 ]( m6 @$ B4 z
Question:
1 f( d. ^$ H- h; CHow a product should be marked and/or classified when it consists of a set of:1 n. t1 Q! }3 }$ r" L# o7 t7 q
1. An independent control gear (Class I or Class II) with SELV output) r* F4 v# j4 {; j: E6 c
and
7 A' q% N4 a% o% _) O; F2. A luminaire (one or more) which is detachable from the control gear (by hand)? r0 C/ V2 }' `! D9 r1 V
Decision:
8 Y3 h5 Z, ]% B t- The independent control gear shall be classified as Class I or Class II;
0 i/ D5 b- j. u- The luminaire shall be marked as Class III;) ~; j# s( d% N9 ~, a
- The whole product may be marked as Class I or Class II on the package. Another way is to mark
5 e+ c" ^7 v# ^the package with the rated voltages of the control gear and the luminaire. Class III marking on the
" q7 L& I( ?- l1 k+ Y+ }package may be misleading, and if applied alone, the marking will be incorrect;/ m$ ~1 O; v: U7 o9 a- `) \) z
- The control gear shall be tested according to Class I or Class II and the luminaire according to
, V$ @3 f* q# w+ u5 A6 ]Class III.
1 D' ]" ?" T; t, ?( [; iExplanatory Notes:3 _1 D+ P7 p" x+ t) M
' U" W. {0 m+ O" ^; ]3 @3 m
. ^ M A; |: n$ Y S9 S6 t8 U各位前辈,请教下此份决议 ]4 \9 C& o. _: z1 r+ p! k
从决议看,认证时可以出一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,然后放在一个包装箱内出货,是这个意思吧,没有讲一定要按整体做一个二类灯具的证书,只是包装箱上做标示即可。
4 X0 u8 ~- d: N5 w如果是的话,分开出证,有利于公司 以后更换电源供应商。& q( t. c, w" d7 e0 s
第二,一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,放在一个包装箱内出货,欧洲海关会不会认为有问题,8 B& f; `4 s: A% T: ?
( f: @8 Z5 R$ D8 K1 [多谢回复
; Q) F$ L' M0 V5 F& l
6 o* a1 r+ ~1 `4 s |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|