|
2 w$ \4 f- O. B1 F8 `
Standard(s): IEC 61558-1/2005 No. Year7 e; k9 z# A( \ ]! j0 J
DSH& n7 H$ P1 R7 [ y8 I
0709+ S* s, \# r5 A1 a
2008
4 |1 z+ U0 B4 F' }Category: SAFE6 q. {6 r$ ^! z/ Y) V3 Y
Subclause(s): 15.2+ {' O2 Y, S( |+ w) W
Developed by: ETF5# z. I4 `. M) R0 s! d! T
OSM/LUM
: i! z- y, W' j" n0 ^: RSubject: Short circuit and
& y. h9 s# @5 K+ K' koverload protection
3 w* X: g- Y( ~7 h# JKey words:
5 S) }0 `) q; x+ H- Transformers
% R( j, L" ^5 `+ j' J" u, T5 r- Steady state conditions
5 [! x6 [# q7 Z0 d+ }: {- Short circuit
" z4 g% ?$ B/ UDecision approved at the
+ C2 E5 E5 R% H4 t. D46th CTL Plenary Meeting,
# D% v' ? O1 M4 z% t" cin 2009
& S4 V, ?/ T% T0 @* X2 ?' J) }' h" L- xQuestion:) K1 Q0 [9 a$ I+ Q
Inherently short-circuit proof transformers shall be tested by short-circuiting the output windings until5 P/ U7 |3 Z; Q$ |* ?
steady-state conditions are reached.
% _( n) H$ X+ @ h, e! f$ s5 bIn IEC 61558-1 “steady-state condition” is not explained. Referring to other standards the meaning of
* h& U7 c0 x% I0 d8 w“steady-state conditions” or “thermal stability” is that the change of temperature is less than 1°C per hour.- O* o4 V& j' l# c v
So following questions arise:
" p0 H, k" G8 q6 G3 I5 o' |: O: b1) Is it correct to record the temperatures after one hour when temperatures did not change (more
6 F& i/ S+ w" ]/ v) q2 lthan 1°C/h)?
( Q7 K6 H3 Y; v& a+ _- r2) How shall an inherently short-circuit proof transformer be assessed when the above mentioned2 P4 T6 W6 n# c5 X% H
requirements are fulfilled, but it is damaged 6h after reaching the steady state condition in a way
# l9 B1 `+ I5 Z3 |- `where safety will be impaired (the transformer bursts).- s# `6 C/ i# M% R
Decision:
. b& V# f! r+ E( \9 _9 y7 B1) Yes.
6 Z! ^7 i9 x8 H# O e% w) z2) The transformer should not be accepted.( Z# H7 ]- O; Z
: Q% q1 q h5 X* t& G! c: R' P& ^1 U9 o( X
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|