|
| DSH 4365 Z. q: q) X# x+ ?6 v
+ N# p! b) }, I4 I+ u
| Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity IDm
0 l |: T$ T; [# I | 9.11.2.3$ a& y5 J8 Z( c8 C' j* B
| 61008-1(ed.2)8 R$ t U5 E# v# Q1 q9 O: F4 ]; g- i
|
% ^* W' M% y9 u" f: H L0 GStandard:
# c# c( Z6 v( u/ F' rIEC 61008-1 (1996-12)
! y5 J2 Y C$ uSub clause:
: M9 e# b) y% z6 ?# ~7 j9.11.2.3; s4 P/ x. |- G8 D( L5 O
Sheet No. 4361 s" d8 |% Y6 X, x* f
Subject:
- {; }& u1 s4 ^Verification of the rated residual: Z- t' ~) M# o5 G+ p
making and breaking capacity IDm
( F5 m9 Z: z% [1 v' k2 tKey words: Confirmed at 39th( ^9 D0 F# Q/ j7 t$ p
CTL Meeting
; W% |# D3 r, V; [Question:9 d2 d2 J* k" @' g
9.11.2.3 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.11.2.1 and states that the resistor R3 shall
- H) d) d& l# m0 x# x" B, l u+ ~not be used.8 N7 h) t; l. Q; n0 g
9.11.2.1 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with resistor R2 to be used.
5 \( j2 D. z: F z# b8 l0 jAccording to these figures, the following inconsistency appears:
2 J# I) Y% a$ h# X& p+ _ {For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
0 o2 f, u5 {7 d: P5 \% {making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.+ Q2 V) J( h& Q# W4 D2 g
For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking/ l! P" `4 l; `7 U# l
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
+ E' c S# D! P; o* |For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
2 h: r4 j- R }/ C7 Ccapacity has to be tested at 400 V.
* [; [5 M @+ p6 B& n5 fFor a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
: ?& f+ m* J; G* a# N- a400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V." H+ Q9 g- ^% A6 H
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
5 ]5 Z) z( V9 A2 ]the test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
4 {$ o. q4 o, s230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
/ k( P5 ~" O* P3 rDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:4 M2 f2 A; s/ I5 D) r1 X
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
5 s0 h2 r" \3 t1 oSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3. U$ F+ G8 d g) \
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting4 b! U9 ~1 S5 d
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
5 A% g, R6 K; `3 b9 T rimportant decision.1 _6 J# v3 Z0 Q( A( D
Therefore the following statement was drafted:4 B7 E: O3 B1 J' T; V- ]# Q
2
* \6 x, K/ Q" YDecision to be forwarded to CTL:
, m. K. P4 Z. N/ w- _ V& NIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
. j/ j. q6 l; R6 f! i, t9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual' d7 w# {& K" U- X8 ?7 C* S" J( t$ o
making and breaking capacity IDm.# w5 y q. c* n9 T- B2 W
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the
$ J+ ~4 T' Q5 Y2 s+ n! {* {: oline to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will9 C: M1 Y- n- l9 T) Q! t$ X0 ]
be included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.8 t: ~3 g9 ]! | @
The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.2 u2 s: Q! b+ Q/ {0 B
, N/ `" X- k, w8 F' z) R. [7 J4 f
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|