|
| DSH 5882 ]0 L. M3 V0 a2 B
q7 c. Q3 n5 i8 e1 f0 D6 O
| Verification of main contact position, position of the handle0 e+ i% }$ x$ t/ }6 c" O
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
) q S$ X) Q- Z2 i4 A | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)
; D9 ]% `9 k. ~: V- [; t# B | 8 W# c P+ @2 V- J
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
& Z( y" |) P, A5 E$ o' ?2, IEC60947-3
4 c7 r: d! G3 F, y$ Q) PSub clause(s):2 q) B; ^2 |! ?' A( X
8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and, ]0 w; M+ I- J# Z8 X
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
! ?5 S& ~- V; E* `! JSheet No.+ x: d! d9 |# c A- @
DSH 588
( d [, Y0 m2 i0 i; ^- H2 aSubject:" Y1 M' u& Z, _/ l+ X
Verification of main contact# T1 Y6 S9 Y. A
position, position of the handle, K! b2 C, n1 S1 P" ?6 g' D
Key words:
`* h7 ^4 q6 w+ x7 @0 Q- suitable for isolation
" Q& v/ n/ p; L$ o9 [- indication of contact
0 ], V, k0 h6 K+ A2 ]. r, Cposition
0 V9 O" |: V6 iDecision approved
# q* V8 ~- [/ D0 N0 V# M9 ^) H7 vduring the CTL Plenary
: C8 H+ g7 _, \0 {, g) Y3 ~8 _Meeting 2006
" ^4 B/ q! ~8 Y* Z: DQuestion:5 M- n* E( m/ j! s! ]
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an9 X" { Q4 i/ z4 p
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to7 a# N' f) t z5 J1 r4 Q
discussions
. V( D9 x/ t/ u! s3 rQ1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which
5 g' g3 V; I& fis not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
8 J8 L, y/ y7 r- eIEC60947-1?
3 S. ]8 O* E4 eQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
, M( G) H9 v/ N- t5 zshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?
% b5 x$ M( E, C, ADecision:
$ P) n3 [4 C1 o/ j7 hThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:
2 Z3 t; X& W! ~/ P" O6 M1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or6 v$ Q+ n! o% F; d3 K$ ?
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a6 b; e& {1 u% e" t7 U' O- t
separate position indicator. q3 N1 |7 U& u" W9 h
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable% J: i/ j- Q/ V* U+ M; V, |
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
3 l; E# b+ ?& {+ R( Q6 R$ Mindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
4 ?7 }: v4 Y6 ]) ]& Wactuator.; u- f; Z* E, K# u4 I2 E6 d- O; O4 k2 O
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
3 N% T) Q: @+ E& [2 A$ T0 o# I* x) {) L8 o0 `* N) x- `3 N. {, n
1 L V; y- `4 _( _+ E e; |2 N+ J+ J+ v |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|