|
| DSH 597
: B% K/ @" k1 ]1 r; t1 j* W- [% \* s; `, G8 Z& _/ S
| Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator" ^% E$ R; f* ?7 a4 N* v: b! Q
| 8.3.3.9
& A3 ?! N1 S; [. x; T! u4 _1 {+ X | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
7 Y- f; A. e7 g" F* I6 S5 ?/ U | / q/ _) ^. E5 ~# }5 }, J# I7 f
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
7 H2 g/ d/ F/ h+ M. _2- I6 w, x3 ]4 a( b# _
Sub clause(s):3 b# E1 i+ h: O2 W, \
8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and2 v, m8 b3 x* v$ \' W9 p
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
, F" z% Z/ g% QDSH3 S- X: X( [# o1 \$ r0 }
597
# V$ ]$ C( O$ [7 |& b7 XSubject:
( D: i: b) v, L; d. {' a! oVerification of main contact! H4 T6 j* N) Q' p$ G1 _
position, position of the actuator
) A2 e2 a6 d% ~& D1 nKey words:+ m# K: W# b; a8 K* R; }
- suitable for isolation
' _. I1 @ {7 K9 f M* ?- indication of contact1 Q2 f$ G2 Y+ `' z3 T# J8 Z" x8 b
position3 `; V( D" C$ [7 S( T; C! N
Decision approved by
# o( V3 d) S% }+ i/ R* F! a& a- I! vthe 44th CTL Plenary" m7 I4 [& o% Z
meeting 20078 S1 E; x* p) L# y0 n
Question:, F3 ]" b+ g8 q2 F5 c4 I
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an, _7 H! X! u i1 a
additional requirement to be verified.
, Z! R# a; v- s) iQ1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is
1 }% ^+ h+ x) R, Q8 ]7 Yneither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a3 ?8 {& F4 i1 N5 z j3 g: R. z
pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?, g/ O7 Z/ A. s+ S8 g
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
* ^2 Z* \/ Y( f( D) T0 Ishould section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?1 m# Z- E7 V5 G: P
Proposal:; | v" J( [$ Y/ I; D
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:
/ Z+ e! |4 Q8 y3 D% q/ |1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or( h- V+ | S' t, k3 y% U
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a! K1 K. v% t& ^; W
separate position indicator.
( D! s, u! i! ?6 W, RFor construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable
! ]) b/ \8 b7 {, l! mFor construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position# {$ F9 }) o; c7 F- K0 w) Q
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the
0 x; p7 d$ Y A% C1 h4 r$ cactuator.
, I0 {3 Y; J1 s' }6 {Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
: V5 B8 b5 |* P" P2 L, C! n) p5 F! f6 ^ A, ^* |
% [( f' g; [7 i$ I; L* M6 @7 K( `& I; ]
! L# ?0 b# m' U( X1 g' _
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|