|
+ X! Y% a6 X2 K& V& O0 g/ m, ~' M
Standard(s)- (year and edition):
# t C8 E/ m, DIEC 60601-1:1988 Ed.2 Am1+Am2, z& ?) F$ H1 L7 j& J9 q9 h
Sub clause(s): ( `! u' I% k! c3 G" K1 \9 m
Sheet n°: DSH-412, k+ q5 L2 ~! E. a# p3 j V
Subject: Detection of fault
0 k r4 e8 s5 F% KKey words: SFC, detection, fault3 O% a/ |! o0 H/ {! u: `! p# B X
Confirmed by CTL at its 39th meeting, in Cologne
3 Q$ V7 J7 A" C l2 L; R2 b9 fQuestion:
3 A7 v! c& e. f4 |! u4 N7 \Shall a fault which remains undetected be considered a NORMAL CONDITION (NC) or a+ B: q+ X6 S0 k0 V& i/ Z, Q
SINGLE FAULT CONDITION (SFC)?
4 \9 V7 A) S# M9 ?If every fault is considered as SFC, regardless of whether it is detected or not, the# C) v. f& [2 Z4 s5 R$ R
consequence will be that there is no protection required against situations where an
/ `3 d$ l1 [3 s. fundetected first fault is followed by a second fault which may cause a SAFETY HAZARD.* k5 M. r. X/ H# Q6 @/ U
Decision:
, J Z$ W9 _, N2 ?6 H9 ^. {If a fault is not detected (for example by periodic inspection, maintenance, auto test, etc....), it
5 w y e5 j# t4 v# ]shall not be considered as a SINGLE FAULT CONDITION.
9 G; y. m2 q0 ^! G5 gTime periodicity for the detection of fault depends on the risk analysis
# F6 C: a3 J! m g" ]. q- z3 Z+ X# F) [
V2 v6 Z3 u0 f$ P4 G+ y# ]6 K, D
2 V7 [- Z$ i- R2 m9 R
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|