|
| DSH 412& m) J% G2 I3 W
1 \. S1 X$ o1 i- S6 V7 p
| Detection of fault
/ I- Y' _" K! p1 } j: {0 ~ | -' s- s+ k( q. O6 w
| 60601-1(ed.2);am1;am24 M2 `% r2 d' Y( v* m
| , O1 I1 q% L; \8 z% {
Standard(s)- (year and edition):
+ q- p2 O- r7 B7 X4 jIEC 60601-1:1988 Ed.2 Am1+Am2% v( s( S6 q1 Y
Sub clause(s): 1 S( P- ]6 i0 }# g5 O k; ~ P' L
Sheet n°: DSH-412" Z0 R3 e: o: I0 p$ w
Subject: Detection of fault
' `8 ~/ ]3 C0 u* P7 aKey words: SFC, detection, fault) y8 |7 C7 [' d' w
Confirmed by CTL at its 39th meeting, in Cologne* X. w3 i% p6 p8 F% X8 S" p
Question:
3 f0 g6 F i( v# E9 N% R7 [Shall a fault which remains undetected be considered a NORMAL CONDITION (NC) or a
( K- m9 J2 B' R: @' iSINGLE FAULT CONDITION (SFC)?, a6 b, u# j/ K/ T4 n6 a5 p9 B
If every fault is considered as SFC, regardless of whether it is detected or not, the
, _+ ~# K1 e; i6 M/ e qconsequence will be that there is no protection required against situations where an1 w0 E: Q$ h/ f: F. Z1 Y
undetected first fault is followed by a second fault which may cause a SAFETY HAZARD.3 b0 a. |3 N7 H8 Q% _8 @
Decision:
* s: m2 F' b. V9 W* y# d2 q- NIf a fault is not detected (for example by periodic inspection, maintenance, auto test, etc....), it! n- J1 I( g( ^ V7 w' X
shall not be considered as a SINGLE FAULT CONDITION.. L7 `8 C4 T5 C( d
Time periodicity for the detection of fault depends on the risk analysis& F& s' Q5 p2 U9 S
1 M$ x8 V2 g7 r3 T) E& X! E
* h4 e0 l3 H# r6 G; l* K+ `, `. T/ S. ?: q% u8 l& p2 w
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|