|
本帖最后由 清水白菜 于 2012-10-29 16:08 编辑 ) N& ]/ F' O9 J0 ^4 t: W
% {' Y5 C* K0 U/ b: ~# z: xTest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | ISO 9773, IEC 60695-11-10 | Class (color) | 0.08 | VTM-2 (NC) | | | | 0.13 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.25 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.51 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.63 | V-0 (ALL) | | | | 3.0 | V-0 (ALL) |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
& L O4 ^6 g7 [9 k& s
% f7 [/ o2 v) \. ^& fTest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60695-11-20 | Class (color) | 0.75 | V-1 (BK) | | | | 1.5 | V-0 (BK) | | | | 2.5 | V-0, 5VA (BK) | | | | 3.0 | V-0, 5VA (BK |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - | 2 t( F! z: m3 O0 ]
( f8 o7 ~' {- g以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样,相关标准要求的厚度不一样;
% E! u7 |% b: Z; P5 o3 e+ ]60950-1里有说到Flammability可以等效互换(见加粗部分), 电气和机械强度方面要具体考虑。
! X0 L& x3 z1 H# p$ WNOTE 1 When applying the requirements in this standard, HF-1 CLASS FOAMED MATERIAL is regarded as better than
3 }& i3 U0 I- ?: }HF-2 CLASS, and HF-2 CLASS better than HBF CLASS., H# V. r+ n6 X
NOTE 2 Similarly, material of 5VA CLASS is regarded as better than 5VB CLASS, 5VB CLASS better than V-0 CLASS,3 k% A! v) I& ?, t
V-0 CLASS better than V-1 CLASS, V-1 CLASS better than V-2 CLASS, V-2 CLASS better than HB40 CLASS and
! k8 P9 i# H% @% M+ Z0 OHB40 CLASS better than HB75 CLASS.3 b+ f( t; f3 r( t# }" j
NOTE 3 Similarly, MATERIAL of VTM-0 CLASS is regarded as better than VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-1 CLASS better than0 \* U% K0 X. D: P& ^
VTM-2 CLASS.7 M& W2 n, |& x, j _$ F# Q+ ^ E
NOTE 4 VTM-0 CLASS, VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-2 CLASS MATERIALS are considered to be equivalent to V-0 CLASS,
* @" y( {# Q. o' y2 x- aV-1 CLASS and V-2 CLASS MATERIALS, respectively, but only for their flammability properties. Their electrical and: y. s9 D$ y$ `
mechanical properties are not necessarily equivalent.2 g9 z: ^' b. Z4 N2 I3 a4 A% }, P; U/ D
NOTE 5 Certain flammability classes have replaced the classes used in earlier editions of this standard. The: Q2 h7 T) K! z: T. R8 k
equivalence of the old and the new classes is shown in Table 1B.; X5 N, }6 x6 u& E
|
|