|
本帖最后由 清水白菜 于 2012-10-29 16:08 编辑
6 X, @5 W7 s1 o4 ~$ N& T$ f5 |6 U' C5 D
Test Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | ISO 9773, IEC 60695-11-10 | Class (color) | 0.08 | VTM-2 (NC) | | | | 0.13 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.25 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.51 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.63 | V-0 (ALL) | | | | 3.0 | V-0 (ALL) |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - | $ s! i3 Z/ a7 R. p; m
) x8 B2 ?- q2 q/ i1 U
Test Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60695-11-20 | Class (color) | 0.75 | V-1 (BK) | | | | 1.5 | V-0 (BK) | | | | 2.5 | V-0, 5VA (BK) | | | | 3.0 | V-0, 5VA (BK |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
' w5 Y/ P# [' n" m% ]: {4 Q
( y/ T3 h$ ~8 q以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样,相关标准要求的厚度不一样;; v' W* E+ d9 r7 J7 x: w7 f: D T& b
60950-1里有说到Flammability可以等效互换(见加粗部分), 电气和机械强度方面要具体考虑。/ O0 D* h& e/ [; [) i1 b+ d
NOTE 1 When applying the requirements in this standard, HF-1 CLASS FOAMED MATERIAL is regarded as better than$ E' c3 H2 k7 r0 i/ U
HF-2 CLASS, and HF-2 CLASS better than HBF CLASS.4 _$ p, z! D9 Z6 \. h1 S
NOTE 2 Similarly, material of 5VA CLASS is regarded as better than 5VB CLASS, 5VB CLASS better than V-0 CLASS,
+ @: g: `+ x- o7 p7 ?V-0 CLASS better than V-1 CLASS, V-1 CLASS better than V-2 CLASS, V-2 CLASS better than HB40 CLASS and
: Y1 \+ |4 w4 OHB40 CLASS better than HB75 CLASS.* v( `: p! d4 r7 Q# G% O
NOTE 3 Similarly, MATERIAL of VTM-0 CLASS is regarded as better than VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-1 CLASS better than
/ ^1 T( x+ ~4 t% d" GVTM-2 CLASS.
, s3 ^2 Q% f6 {# h0 `9 e5 ANOTE 4 VTM-0 CLASS, VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-2 CLASS MATERIALS are considered to be equivalent to V-0 CLASS,
1 I" W3 [# e% ^8 M, h' xV-1 CLASS and V-2 CLASS MATERIALS, respectively, but only for their flammability properties. Their electrical and8 _# H& w+ L5 ?! W
mechanical properties are not necessarily equivalent.& w% U" a4 B( y9 [/ I
NOTE 5 Certain flammability classes have replaced the classes used in earlier editions of this standard. The
+ {& j, Z8 R2 `+ y- [1 lequivalence of the old and the new classes is shown in Table 1B.8 b7 j- Z% `4 J# n' J0 y& q
|
|