|
( n0 g: C* H7 j/ M
; ]; X& U% S5 y7 H) L4 ]/ W
| Integrity of clearances and creepage distances' p+ G3 D5 E S8 { {$ S
| 10.1
% B |$ V$ ?' H8 h | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
2 i/ k5 f( ^: w/ G | ! d3 X% c( n9 V' |1 e
+ J) I* }$ q/ K; u9 l" Z; C
Standard:8 D8 _& b5 f! O. j
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
" k( ?) [* s/ X- O1 {:1995
$ d0 h1 w0 t$ u2 I% u7 i+ U& MSub clause:
& r! r _; g- \" ~6 S% [% a10.1
4 y# W6 |6 ]3 {/ x1 wSheet n. 337
% U" z' q& ~8 q. a/ I5 aPage 1(1): D" ?) ]/ T. p2 L
Subject:
6 U8 a e( J, t# ?4 T/ ?+ WIntegrity of clearances and
- J! R2 {" [, R) qcreepage distances
" \6 Z) S* l( _* e4 ^Key words:" K3 y& T; E3 o* ~1 F/ [' `
- Clearances distances8 a1 F3 R: H: l
- Creepage distances* w. a7 h y. k1 N: M
Decision n. 23 taken at
5 {* c9 c' b v9 V! b: v37th meeting/2000) J! C- M3 h1 [, Z
Question:
4 q0 [% d! n' i3 W$ d. Y; GStrict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.# q# O+ u" k( M" \
How is this clause considered for compliance?4 q6 e% Y) K$ n' p1 Q$ q" p4 Z
This question is from CTL.# u6 J. R: l d( K
Decision:, a& ^1 o! g; [: z' Q1 _; a, |
See Explanatory Notes
2 p* _, i7 z7 {! KExplanatory Notes:) g- a, I' x+ A3 F1 E" w+ n! W
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to
( G1 E3 G3 D, c9 Sensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then
/ P/ v' G% ?+ N! f( Cfurther tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for
& A U s4 O$ k/ M( [the creepage and clearance distances.
& |* K2 d0 Z9 f1 t% @; D8 Q& X2 U' _, R0 l0 a' t
: J/ l4 ^" L9 c* n6 x
5 S. J3 e# @/ m0 q |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|