|
|
/ M" q' m0 B- b; j) s7 f0 J
$ f! F" O) \$ R& f Q0 i! e
| Integrity of clearances and creepage distances
. [+ {7 A v" H1 Q# K5 h6 v7 ~ | 10.1
. Z" u% ~3 w0 X* G$ e | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
y" c: v2 G1 w# U9 N |
2 i3 ^- U0 X* T% I/ F5 i
( N5 Z, |$ {0 j: @0 nStandard:3 f( o' o1 |9 v) u" K7 u
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
+ _6 X. X. i8 B. K:1995
1 }, `* B1 K- a$ {+ |% R5 USub clause:
( _( d3 y. S3 x" D; T10.1
; o# p9 {0 l2 B0 M1 `9 e, eSheet n. 337
( V5 e4 }2 s7 c' F7 j X( fPage 1(1): u7 C/ L1 r4 \2 `5 y+ H* c
Subject:7 R4 F; e2 \* W& v" \
Integrity of clearances and; m% K8 d6 [9 u0 M
creepage distances
8 t% U- e, y3 tKey words:
/ J3 z' Y0 ~, f) T0 A! Y- Clearances distances
# o& v' y3 H6 l; U* G3 x X- Creepage distances
1 w! Q% u9 T9 h1 c# JDecision n. 23 taken at$ |5 C D n( y; |' J% }" l) P4 Y, M
37th meeting/2000
1 w/ d$ T/ P5 h& D, z9 rQuestion:$ F: n7 G8 g7 \) G0 f
Strict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.: F$ I* t' t' c2 J1 y6 B; N) Z3 g
How is this clause considered for compliance?
5 |9 j: M* C# a/ HThis question is from CTL.
. s, n8 h* t# Y3 D2 H& @Decision:3 _4 [& _% e1 x! i
See Explanatory Notes. b L6 m* y5 B
Explanatory Notes:+ ^& O% @0 q4 b
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to
1 j% M/ A4 w6 [+ J7 q, f$ M# R4 nensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then: i) e2 K) j' R- w$ d
further tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for
+ ^+ T) ^' }- j$ P7 C: `, V- _the creepage and clearance distances.! [) O. M- S- j1 p
7 L1 C; K: _9 U( U0 n2 l4 `5 O+ k% H
+ ~2 L% B4 d" ]* P4 ]0 h* K( x |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册安规
x
|
/1 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-9-19 13:45
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡