|
b- f9 M8 p! L5 g3 K0 x8 z5 B; B9 e6 J% s
| Integrity of clearances and creepage distances
2 x3 m4 p/ J/ K( b) }8 M | 10.1
7 y- ?! p, H+ { | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am27 Q9 p" u6 ?/ ]) R3 U3 k9 g
|
$ a( z# T' E" V" U. [1 H: i6 A- m8 w% Y; H
Standard:. C' z* d7 y5 Q N6 {
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2, X: m1 }3 P' }
:1995
/ A" H( W9 v. m& t: [Sub clause:
. M4 c" V+ i6 o0 ^6 z! }; h6 R10.12 E+ Y7 p- A( ^( I5 ^/ Z t
Sheet n. 337
2 m8 o2 C }; G9 }/ WPage 1(1)1 A8 i* X; q' g9 f9 o: m
Subject:9 Q; Y+ j8 O" R/ _/ n( s9 I' G
Integrity of clearances and
/ Q0 M0 e! v2 n, kcreepage distances
/ p/ O4 x& m3 W; z3 J. @Key words:
% ~( s( p3 Z$ C, T& R8 M) W- Clearances distances& B4 f( n; k, t b
- Creepage distances7 m( _) H4 \7 s
Decision n. 23 taken at- j# e- W n2 z" Q( [! j( v
37th meeting/2000
% k% E# Z+ T. n$ J0 _% x5 ]. ]Question:
9 w* Q. T' k# f& O& D+ pStrict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.$ Q3 |( R, {3 N0 \
How is this clause considered for compliance?; t, l% j9 u$ @+ C
This question is from CTL.
' {5 I( g) k, vDecision:6 s6 J2 Q1 q) t( I S
See Explanatory Notes
9 T+ b- l. g& e5 V+ s X' `8 j+ IExplanatory Notes:& ^2 \( _. ]# X
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to* n. [& M+ X* r* p, g. ]
ensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then
F! G& M9 E! h3 f7 w& q( tfurther tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for
/ J- a4 N4 f+ d* Z/ k. m3 hthe creepage and clearance distances. y. e+ T, t5 Z' n9 }
: f+ Q; g5 L7 {+ A1 u3 L
% ]( u% V0 a* K% S) ~7 V
, T% W7 N1 n. r3 n" A& O |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|