|
|
) j& X# h) w6 d$ a$ s k7 C
9 j, m# J" n# ^8 ~7 e- x2 _ | Integrity of clearances and creepage distances3 A' \3 y' N/ e
| 10.17 H) Q5 r4 _+ V" w$ P; F
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
1 I1 u9 t3 Q( ^& { |
, M( r: ~( e$ L. g9 j8 c h- z) f% s9 [* ?
Standard:
5 l; [$ R" d: j9 {$ s( sIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
( F) |! [( r( M2 Q# y9 W& K& A:1995: o9 d" T; q9 s/ o7 ~! [$ y# q
Sub clause:
4 ^. d3 b' m I0 f' r3 E" R10.1
9 p4 E' n4 i& x) aSheet n. 337
9 V$ k# j2 B& T: y, h3 J8 SPage 1(1)9 _- t5 r$ ]# q; e
Subject:" ?4 D- [, r. d8 u. |
Integrity of clearances and
6 R6 @' Q) K+ X# {creepage distances
9 [+ ?8 t+ }% T% b V+ v, ]! o9 EKey words:8 B! {: e7 d) }; t) x5 ]9 F
- Clearances distances
0 n8 e, r1 I. \/ X# @) e. C& W- Creepage distances/ s. U( ]5 `' ~& a0 e6 J# b2 N
Decision n. 23 taken at
. n# r$ `5 p+ B5 r$ i0 r: @37th meeting/2000* V, V6 c. b |1 v2 Z$ c
Question:
: O% V- o* U1 f8 A- |& qStrict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work./ M8 f* b6 F) Z6 e& e
How is this clause considered for compliance?1 w# y8 V% K1 S& V# d! D" F
This question is from CTL." ?' q5 {: J- ]3 M; e
Decision:
2 S: N* }: [8 R: B3 V2 e' }See Explanatory Notes
7 y! [0 M4 |$ L' @3 a! v2 x, sExplanatory Notes:3 _) f7 \2 a3 `+ p8 n. k" O* p# B
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to6 G* c- y4 ], z
ensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then
0 F; L8 I j) x9 I5 cfurther tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for2 U6 W* _' l7 I2 Q
the creepage and clearance distances.
5 j) W3 B6 U8 d8 t K" d" x9 e" c; \/ z# W7 U, @" @1 r/ k
& L7 l* t: Z' B- o8 s
. _6 d* K/ Q% @+ ^, D4 ^ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册安规
x
|
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-9-19 13:45
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡
