|
| PDSH 1011
9 ]4 t$ {3 _" \' O | Annex B, i# J" M* e) I6 U3 ]4 e3 ^7 r
| Annex B
/ B7 G$ G5 E& O2 J" k | 61347-1(ed.1);am1 & 61347-1(ed.2);am1 & 61347-2-9(ed.1);am1;am2& v. U& [2 p+ q( c; T$ p
| ( W2 p0 h7 M/ h# \7 c
Standard(s):
/ \- W! j$ U* O; EIEC 61347-1
, d( A z, w$ z* o3 pIEC 61347-2-9 All editions1 w7 A! a+ @2 g3 _
Subclause(s): Annex B
( }: ~8 Q5 s' s6 f: Q' j; ANo. Year PDSH 1011 2010
0 c' P: e1 {# ?) O- e1 HCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM; m) f( ~0 j* p; |9 @
Subject:- j% B3 K+ a# r6 s7 O6 o' I
Annex B' D, j4 y: g$ f/ a: g
Key words:
1 J( b2 P- b0 X: G1 K5 }- Discharge lamps
/ n2 t. B0 z. O5 x4 c- Thermal protector# l, v' ?/ T' l+ t" s
- IEC 60730-2-9+ [7 T* l) s% i) C3 i
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012" }* g4 u! T; K3 o! c0 L( C
Question:3 K9 _% j1 N6 B6 e) F& M
Would it would be acceptable that a thermally protected ballast for discharge lamps (according to Annex- N. x$ H& C5 s4 z+ Y! X- w' M
B of IEC 61347-2-9), include a thermal protector control according to IEC 60730-2-9 instead of a thermal# B7 D3 J" n- R9 M! J3 ~- v. F. |1 ~
protector in compliance with IEC 60730-2-3?
2 \. z& ^0 Q2 T6 K/ N4 vDecision:
) |# B6 `( T$ @$ D& N2 qNo. Reference to IEC 60730-2-9 is not acceptable.( K: q4 s3 B) U/ ^9 e/ e2 i4 }
+ w' e0 d/ f' Z& `6 @4 |* k0 l
$ p7 _( h# w3 l( p8 f O |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|