|
| PDSH 854
! \% ~3 S$ q, ?6 u% s" @ G, B
3 W/ G: D! z) ~/ s+ @# H0 J | Screw connections
8 v4 g2 k8 l0 A | 4.11.3: k8 J' v: |% H( g& E3 g. f
| 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7)
) d7 }2 |3 t" e- h& f9 l% Z* o | ' Y, L9 K6 Y/ O1 `/ R: D3 N
Standard(s):
* r% o$ Z8 o" M* b7 U9 B! ~9 y. IIEC 60598-1 All editions
3 j+ a1 X, Q" G$ \Subclause(s): 4.11.3
$ b7 X& k4 e. k, i! O" vNo. Year PDSH 0854 2010
! n8 ]) Z0 l' F; N' m" k' H4 q( GCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
1 ?. a( X1 l* G' o/ @* w/ l+ rSubject:# s5 x l3 Z9 T; w6 ]4 Y
Screw connections, n( b, ]8 @' l2 \
Key words:8 g3 K: a% B7 p* A
- Small “spikes”
! m. U+ r/ f2 [" R4 y2 g- Locking of screw connections D1 n! C1 `) g. y, w" L3 f
- Ballast7 m6 Q- s; R' u8 }+ `1 _: o" `
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012; n4 }9 E/ l% E" n* {
Question:$ C9 y- N" F6 j( w$ p3 r
Are two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?
: t. { s+ r2 x3 O& S1 mDecision:
9 C4 w% J* m: z/ c* xThe solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.5 E. L2 P5 P6 {+ @0 G V$ K, e3 c9 @
% b. m% p& L; s; `) \
% g8 z x/ \6 C# {4 ~
9 @5 \1 p* d$ ^( H0 n; k0 w4 _
' [+ F+ y8 A0 K9 C8 `0 S
9 q5 `, }7 y& H9 h6 s3 q' E$ r- n7 r; _
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|