|
| PDSH 854
n# M2 W! @2 B2 y
6 a) l8 p& i* i/ G% h6 z | Screw connections2 v* a2 ~" O/ [" O) q
| 4.11.3
5 V9 k7 g B! B- l5 t# i( x) ^ | 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7)
% A% y; [$ a: z1 c/ u( E |
; ^* i$ X. V+ ]6 \; MStandard(s):
" `8 e3 }; o2 G" V$ ^1 ~IEC 60598-1 All editions$ {9 Q$ T7 C+ E2 H
Subclause(s): 4.11.3" ]& L" L4 k8 \
No. Year PDSH 0854 2010
' v+ `" N/ _1 m& j0 r# l mCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
* Y3 z6 P( Z# WSubject:
8 p# Q g6 a9 n A% NScrew connections
; I. g$ u$ K/ `+ R0 s/ S% H$ ?Key words:
4 R1 p, T& S9 H& y5 {: c- Small “spikes”
) J4 |6 } l/ ]# F- Locking of screw connections
9 } X. i% R3 _; v- Ballast
M+ G' k0 \ q. S% M/ BTo be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 20123 n! N4 I, h5 g
Question:' I. l, o Y, q' m/ |: p% }
Are two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?1 {6 ^( }3 v) v2 z$ l2 Z
Decision:8 ]' M9 T7 f' X( c3 g/ y& \1 ?8 T
The solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.
6 J# ^% p: \( y
% S8 ?0 I S( K6 m2 @" ?
9 }; _* s5 i2 J T% t" U' Q; n8 v% J* h) l+ O
8 j% D2 F( w. m, H# T' u
0 E3 y) f/ s! B) m0 y! s9 X( Y' x+ E$ \
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|