|
/ ]# A. f7 ^" q0 e% {
Standard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition 5 @5 }( k4 d3 q4 l
Sub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1
+ E, N' O3 `6 R' V( ]- g8 l8 WSheet n. 252 A
/ m- a, x. F l9 n0 XSubject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment! C# _$ J( u1 ~, b- I# Z: D
Key words:
' `9 [+ v3 O: q% E4 s( I- crimp connection& {' s: K% G! a1 r) a& m
- type M attachment0 f, L. O1 j2 I- \
Decision 13 of 34th meeting/1997
1 W7 s- z$ _) aQuestion:
6 ?9 c( y9 t7 X$ Q9 ZSubclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,
; |6 p! s1 v0 g; x% o/ zand( h. \( A0 q1 G8 J6 r9 C
subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z
* P. @2 f& `: B3 @8 oattachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the8 c. N3 M3 q4 `# @6 C* K- k
connection of external conductors”$ y9 F0 K. k6 ~2 q/ g
Is there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
3 J$ Z8 i+ b F, ]8 {) m7 lof crimp connections in type M attachment?
2 N: W8 |7 f- d7 ^5 CAre crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?! k8 {/ r: n. q! `& O
Decision:* {3 {' M v" U! }5 X$ U
- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1* h7 Z0 W$ Q Z
refers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.0 N2 i. ?1 S, Z" i" w" e1 t
- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see! B# Z$ T6 @* X! o; N
sketch below).1 I) k: W; b9 z/ e% d
5 F( R- P. w' {! I
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|