|
| DSH 252A }5 a& B' Z0 t7 G# Y k4 n* O5 ]9 f
! m; h! f( u U v( w2 s
| Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
/ n2 p$ |. z( J3 X. Z | 2.2.10 and 26.1! W+ x) ^+ c2 e! C, b) h2 L2 _6 t7 H
| 60335-1(ed.2)
5 P& G0 G3 B9 W: ~6 { | * ?. S) t" p( z& e# {( J
Standard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition $ V; ]- P+ t6 Q% z/ G P8 B
Sub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1
* {, N- i& l+ Y; _8 b. Q' u) ySheet n. 252 A
! h% _2 z0 u$ ~9 {# C1 O: c: G4 tSubject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
/ r1 p* e, ]7 t+ o6 M& |Key words:
# R/ ?( u, n* ] |; {: Z4 N7 i$ }, H- crimp connection, \/ r. n( y" S! B# l' C% J4 b
- type M attachment* t4 X5 Q& [# B
Decision 13 of 34th meeting/1997
4 z9 u Y- ~7 N* e4 hQuestion:/ ]% R4 J* U& t1 h0 X
Subclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,
) o- m2 H) ~' y& e8 [and
8 D1 d) H$ H6 ^: q5 e, ]subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z' j. f5 o: C. w# C
attachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
M6 o2 U' _- yconnection of external conductors”6 R( z u$ Y+ p" v2 K
Is there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
+ u' g$ j/ F$ K% A- n0 p3 `of crimp connections in type M attachment?
+ t7 q |7 f% i9 P' k; j+ ]Are crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?
) N+ o, ?/ R: b) t$ C/ G7 d- }* h$ }Decision:$ |: i% Q4 s5 }/ K c0 B
- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1
; |+ J9 C# r ^$ Crefers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment./ r! n! I2 \3 m+ s5 s" \
- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see
* m, a! _. H7 N$ W7 X+ }/ |6 Vsketch below).6 y% `7 t: B f( C- G! @. ^9 s
2 M4 |3 a' d% {* X
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|