|
| DSH 568
' U" [$ ] v6 a6 [
* R, _: A3 F w! B | Varistors (VDR’s) across the mains3 @- ]0 k* j. c4 U# x3 l6 f) d
| 19.11& K; \; {( J) U
| 60335-1(ed.4)1 Y; D# y, g$ C9 L1 G
| 2 H( V9 W" G; W4 y/ F3 G/ M
Question:
8 [ z }' Q0 iReports from different Testing Laboratories and clients expose essential differences in interpretation and testing practice between laboratories and/or Certification Bodies.
/ D) n$ Z' A0 W+ w) l* |" RActually, the practice of one Certification Body is now being a market factor. f- P: C% W' f% R5 K; ~& G8 W8 l5 Q
Based on above concerns we ask for clarification:0 q. d& ~# h, w9 j( W
1: Shall Cl. 19.11 be strictly followed or can solutions given under 2. be accepted.
4 c! u i& \, e+ P' n1 T- f2: Can any of the decisions (made by OSM/EE) be accepted?
1 W0 B2 ?% }* g3 P: G- A: VDR’s across the mains are accepted if the VDR is separately certified according to IEC 61051-1 or according to CECC 42200.0 [& p- \2 O. w/ m1 M2 k
- B: VDR across the mains with a protective device to guard against short-circuit is acceptable.
- U* h9 ~. s- |- C: If A and B are acceptable, should, because of the fact that VDR’s may burn or burst during life-time due to an increasing temperature stress caused by increase of leakage current with a number of switching cycles in the VDR, a thermal interrupting device on the VDR connected in series with the VDR be required.+ _0 @. \, f4 t: @
Decision:
1 \0 [) q% p3 O. ]1. VDR’s are not short-circuited if they are used within their manufacturer’s declared specification, when tested according to Sub-clause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(1991).
) r7 O6 M7 |+ g2. VDR’s are short-circuited regardless of compliance with IEC61051-1, when tested according to Subclause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(2001).3 s1 p- `; P4 H3 h6 [: ^8 H- {7 `
0 o$ n0 v: H! i$ G e5 f
5 t$ |% N; R9 t- G3 M
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|