|
ylgc123 发表于 2018-10-29 09:304 w& w5 P# ?4 V% k5 r
我去看了下OSM431决议,决议上的2个案例图片和楼主图中显示的还是有差异的。! ^; M L/ w6 L9 I @( T. o
9 s! a. }' a8 N, }9 N另外就目前看来决议上案 ...
, L# k2 _- O1 I再翻了一下60335-1/ A1:2013的clause 25.13; e" w* ~3 u% Z! z. U
' T! n8 j$ ~- t0 m+ M8 k& e
25.13 In the requirement, replace the second sentence by the following:
: q* ~* a/ D9 a4 a# \If it is not evident from the construction of the appliance that the supply cord can be8 N, J; i' H: N$ G
introduced without risk of damage, a non-detachable lining or non-detachable bushing
: F+ q6 {: p$ f" Gshall be provided that complies with 29.3 for supplementary insulation.; y2 p0 B8 d$ A' ]( n
$ c4 z G8 D/ Y M& f2 f# J- n0 V
己经把金属进线口给改过来了,所以OSM431的决议也就成为过去式了。变成了圆滑的金属进线口都没问了题。 |
|