|
ylgc123 发表于 2018-10-29 09:30( H" X8 c6 U5 t2 m* j( t4 }
我去看了下OSM431决议,决议上的2个案例图片和楼主图中显示的还是有差异的。
0 R f4 k# W% s4 Q! M$ ~! ^% R& `9 X* Q
另外就目前看来决议上案 ... & |, m' [* s( I" n F
再翻了一下60335-1/ A1:2013的clause 25.13+ C: h6 Z- h# r9 c4 K
8 ?# p$ y' }. v: f- P1 @25.13 In the requirement, replace the second sentence by the following:
$ K1 R6 q4 u$ X$ `: pIf it is not evident from the construction of the appliance that the supply cord can be3 s# z& k b# t# {* C+ \
introduced without risk of damage, a non-detachable lining or non-detachable bushing
! v6 V& N' E Ushall be provided that complies with 29.3 for supplementary insulation.% V" k: \1 X5 F; V
1 Y: D, d; i5 O$ Q
己经把金属进线口给改过来了,所以OSM431的决议也就成为过去式了。变成了圆滑的金属进线口都没问了题。 |
|