|
本帖最后由 terry20120318 于 2012-11-27 16:56 编辑
% W( x; S1 m. [) B9 b7 W
+ ]0 [/ t1 Y6 k) |. v% U
0 h" e3 _ w6 l0 ~' r) i5 i$ N. T3 F, X; ~- A; b& f
Question:
6 j, w. Y4 U8 YHow a product should be marked and/or classified when it consists of a set of:
: e8 ~. F2 g% s) C+ h7 f* n1. An independent control gear (Class I or Class II) with SELV output% V0 C. u$ m# M- K" V+ W3 F! y
and
& A" I, l6 R# n. [% |2. A luminaire (one or more) which is detachable from the control gear (by hand)?
. R6 J" a% J) F6 {# IDecision:) `( T3 T( `" ~: ?# y7 k; ~
- The independent control gear shall be classified as Class I or Class II;, G) g, l/ c" J! ~8 f
- The luminaire shall be marked as Class III;
. D# X/ v$ j% m- The whole product may be marked as Class I or Class II on the package. Another way is to mark$ n8 x: G$ @! }# r
the package with the rated voltages of the control gear and the luminaire. Class III marking on the
& F0 z L6 L! n; E2 O- Apackage may be misleading, and if applied alone, the marking will be incorrect;# `, U* x) c% J! v1 o+ I+ U& p
- The control gear shall be tested according to Class I or Class II and the luminaire according to3 }- _2 Q. f( F$ V1 k9 V% _* R- |
Class III.2 j/ o7 S! A* y+ E. v+ L
Explanatory Notes:
1 ^/ f9 }5 e- |; H7 B' v
# U" \! I! y3 m- B8 a$ B- I8 y5 C8 \0 B1 }( \+ ~4 l
各位前辈,请教下此份决议
$ P: T; L8 j' j" e/ `7 z3 n从决议看,认证时可以出一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,然后放在一个包装箱内出货,是这个意思吧,没有讲一定要按整体做一个二类灯具的证书,只是包装箱上做标示即可。8 @8 L* F4 ]. a5 q2 h; z& p6 o; G+ @" j4 p
如果是的话,分开出证,有利于公司 以后更换电源供应商。8 j4 p$ ] v, i5 {, D/ y
第二,一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,放在一个包装箱内出货,欧洲海关会不会认为有问题,% a4 A; C& k/ |- t$ z
8 U0 I1 Y) c% ^+ I! ?! b
多谢回复
1 ~ k5 @( U, g% {7 J4 q4 d1 z& R1 \: ?+ X2 [
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|