|
本帖最后由 terry20120318 于 2012-11-27 16:56 编辑 ) N' l% p6 C1 c# z# ^
! c4 u& m3 Y& t+ n3 g$ I. M
+ O' |9 m0 [1 ]' d8 z
5 N/ i, E3 c# k7 L* i2 HQuestion:# i2 d0 r1 b4 _$ L2 T9 m4 y
How a product should be marked and/or classified when it consists of a set of:
5 u# O! k, _ Q' c( G$ |% \1. An independent control gear (Class I or Class II) with SELV output6 [% _5 ^" a f
and
/ P7 E ?; a3 O1 ~2. A luminaire (one or more) which is detachable from the control gear (by hand)?
6 O, B$ h" q2 y4 V7 vDecision:& @" W# [' Y- j3 Y" i$ G" z5 J
- The independent control gear shall be classified as Class I or Class II;
/ l$ l0 @# x( v' J% C$ y9 K- The luminaire shall be marked as Class III;
! u( ~7 O4 _1 }6 \( U! I- The whole product may be marked as Class I or Class II on the package. Another way is to mark; v( h4 F$ g. r. D+ n
the package with the rated voltages of the control gear and the luminaire. Class III marking on the) h0 N) {; M# M8 @: G
package may be misleading, and if applied alone, the marking will be incorrect;
$ r1 B& j2 n3 e" I/ A' W# Q- The control gear shall be tested according to Class I or Class II and the luminaire according to
# P- \1 K, y! B: _, VClass III. [+ E- [# \- \8 P' T7 s4 _
Explanatory Notes:
' m( ^( D, t0 l3 r
/ H2 y V9 F& A8 r4 E; [6 z" [2 Q' ]- ^7 u# z; f. A
各位前辈,请教下此份决议
' u# k, f9 A# o7 l/ K4 M8 D从决议看,认证时可以出一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,然后放在一个包装箱内出货,是这个意思吧,没有讲一定要按整体做一个二类灯具的证书,只是包装箱上做标示即可。
0 b; t) E" `3 Q$ S如果是的话,分开出证,有利于公司 以后更换电源供应商。
0 f% y8 [# ?* n8 b) Y8 J2 D第二,一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,放在一个包装箱内出货,欧洲海关会不会认为有问题," Z8 _+ a0 f+ H" ^6 u9 s
' B* z7 u0 H; t! O& G$ F: Q
多谢回复! ~+ i7 o% r# J% G2 ]* w. `
% }$ ^, j9 K0 ~ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|