|
| DSH 2817 F1 a0 \% @; b' E% n1 G
, @9 _" A" P: ?& K
| Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19
- P: |& j( e% h; K- k | 19.11.2; P' w2 `' V( G# p C# d$ \
| 60335-1(ed.3)
9 _7 m G: q4 f% ]& G, r7 K: H1 ` | 7 {; C; K( h1 x+ U7 Q
Standard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 281
: ?0 s4 s7 s; \+ ?Page 1(1); i$ Z i; N! B+ V+ a3 {
Subject: Open circuit of conductor
& u7 \2 d7 k( j Rof PCB during tests of clause 19- o' g/ t# L: c
Key words:* j7 k5 P- V* M" F- L1 b5 l' c
- PCB% C+ s5 V# Q3 M( w4 _/ K" p5 z D
Conductor
" M4 B8 t9 [8 g! mDecision n. 20 taken
1 j& x; f4 r8 k/ Q% ~: qAt 36th meeting/1999
+ K7 v9 C8 U3 g& L6 N9 I4 C# a" yQuestion: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up3 t8 ?& W5 O1 J! ]1 U
Taking into account that:% y3 {! H _) t5 g0 o8 `- ]
- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,
( ^0 F3 o% J: _4 r- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances
1 k8 ^! I5 ~6 q, d) H/ Hbelow the required values+ B! \4 c1 O4 ^ P* S' {
- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor
9 D+ M0 Y3 Q5 l3 n9 pbridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,
! c% ?/ o+ P q- Z. Nare the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?
/ _ f. l! y: c; B1 D; |Decision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the
+ I* J8 W( i2 Q% ?, jPCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit.
! b) `- D9 w" F1 IThis can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
- V# b! w+ ~3 Y. g4 |2 F, A7 `same conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is. C9 _/ o9 B) N
defined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.) @5 J4 o% i1 ~- ^7 J0 a2 }
4 g: Y7 N7 V4 \' |2 J$ j3 t, d" B& [& x3 \) a9 C' A
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|