|
| DSH 2818 y- g* X9 n0 @+ I
# `/ l3 s; F3 e1 `2 n | Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19
* {7 h. x* `4 }8 { L. M% Q | 19.11.2+ J( L8 E% s3 J c/ C9 G
| 60335-1(ed.3)% ?1 [* O/ @* p3 @% Z
|
* A b( V% D2 ZStandard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 281
9 y: |- N" k, _; D9 VPage 1(1)
' {3 K! L( u3 ?1 [& ]6 m7 j+ wSubject: Open circuit of conductor
. d5 z- f* C9 b2 e* k" Cof PCB during tests of clause 19
4 R1 j- l9 p3 NKey words:6 g1 u) W8 C, {- s
- PCB. r. k% N/ r! ~. J% D f- ~( L7 ?
Conductor+ d) P; k+ n/ m: e9 k$ P. [; `
Decision n. 20 taken' p' n# q Y5 F' I
At 36th meeting/1999
/ ~3 Z" a2 r% p3 g E5 H, YQuestion: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up1 C& N" N1 Z0 l1 |
Taking into account that:
) z4 }4 C1 |7 N0 q8 i- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,
# b. E' ?" ~( ^2 X4 c6 C2 g- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances
?- V; r; X/ z! Y& ibelow the required values6 o4 b4 e0 n5 N4 B! [
- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor
6 E0 X) O$ \7 m" |5 Bbridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,
" [ M4 R. M; Gare the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?
9 t! r& G2 F& P1 V9 rDecision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the
/ R* L A; \* v! E# u: cPCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit.; G) f4 x! X" l- d
This can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
, d1 I# ], ^: zsame conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is
9 n7 ?3 Y; k/ i3 w. E& Z' e* F- sdefined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.
3 _( {3 S: }2 F1 f- C1 d% n* P E1 ^: f7 }( l4 r
4 s1 r# _% ^; d$ z) h
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|