|
| DSH 281
2 x$ A3 u- J" [/ t3 G* d3 x) Z5 n5 L4 I+ U
| Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19
8 k- I9 K' ~, z | 19.11.2+ n: M) e4 M( k8 L
| 60335-1(ed.3)1 V9 P$ G$ P1 _, y
|
% y3 `# O$ n2 eStandard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 281! v7 a! D: `. F
Page 1(1)
2 L- w8 A' p3 |" ]- aSubject: Open circuit of conductor, s7 `% z g5 c: z! x: M1 h
of PCB during tests of clause 19) W4 I5 q0 a8 X$ z' G5 h
Key words:) ?4 T3 \: [, X, @
- PCB
: p* ]2 ]$ S- I. vConductor, `6 V3 `( d; L: l
Decision n. 20 taken
* V$ y# W; ^) u. b {- gAt 36th meeting/1999
; s' G: n0 Q# s' _Question: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up! e5 _1 q" z8 F3 e5 f& m
Taking into account that:# M A; y) d; ]- p9 B
- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,* j* \6 l2 k% l& O) V4 @
- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances- b" w, y8 J. J" m8 S, Q' E
below the required values$ }5 k+ p) H4 ~( @
- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor
% v$ _- k1 V/ [9 rbridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,% H" N( W# G, e1 E
are the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?5 ?% S0 T& X# `8 `
Decision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the
3 x8 S ?5 L3 A U) d) uPCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit., y7 T' H5 j- _
This can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
% I" |. Y: G% {2 q @4 nsame conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is! k$ Z$ ~- T2 v+ d* K
defined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.
! h0 t! W6 _+ D% r" @% J$ H! ~4 y, Q; t+ z6 g; q6 c
0 x6 R6 U x( X+ `/ j6 w$ Q
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|