|
| DSH 281
# {7 k- U( O. C& N' J! f$ i. t0 D& }
| Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 198 }+ Y8 @( N% h' S1 Z8 q
| 19.11.2
' k3 o, r3 F* Q( c | 60335-1(ed.3)
5 S( _3 W7 O' y* L | : x. b4 _7 v& {3 {, D( [ d
Standard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 281$ J, g( M7 I+ S
Page 1(1)' o/ Y& t! O8 @& k5 e' a" w- \; c
Subject: Open circuit of conductor" G8 [9 T$ p* a w( V
of PCB during tests of clause 192 X" Y- a3 G. ^2 K$ {* S# E
Key words:
2 _. v) [5 J& Z+ ^, P* H- PCB+ ^3 t$ `6 N/ X6 i% B
Conductor( W2 P$ z$ y1 ?: t
Decision n. 20 taken
8 G% R: h+ W; [4 ?, t' CAt 36th meeting/1999
I8 X, s- a- SQuestion: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up
( X# q0 l2 Z$ ?: S W5 JTaking into account that:
( Y* Q0 c. N% U& R8 a% ?6 D j- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,* n2 D& V# t, {
- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances
1 e5 M/ K& L) j4 \* tbelow the required values2 L$ A/ d; k3 l8 B& k
- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor# Z: w9 _/ V4 s# O/ K2 k/ ]' c2 {
bridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,
Q2 T& {7 J, L! Lare the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?% |* @' b5 `3 h S4 e# j. t+ _
Decision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the1 L3 I c! `' w% i1 S, ^+ M
PCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit.
+ J7 Z( m; r! @9 U. c$ OThis can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
" H4 J4 z# e, p: d. I( Ksame conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is
( D; U% \% M: `/ M" O' jdefined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.7 c6 p; s& u2 O! z1 B3 d
3 z/ X: W9 T# L2 `4 i, ]& i
, m' L" D, G5 J$ ~' a |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|