|
|
# O! Z$ a0 Y; f% g$ i9 ~
) L# T# n8 |" I8 N) y DSH 337
" z) q( Y& {+ x- J9 v# y2 b | Integrity of clearances and creepage distances8 U- B7 w# l& t5 x4 p! n D
| 10.1
( W! h- A) K# c5 M | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am29 _# b4 Q$ h: A7 f4 y2 R( g t
|
, k( A, F" B$ c: M4 i9 K
, O, N) n) Z. j/ w. Z, a# M1 o
Standard:
, g* M+ J5 U1 F2 y3 C$ ]$ o# cIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2" I% E; k2 `% L( q
:1995" \1 }9 H9 r- m+ [2 |9 ]& N
Sub clause:
9 b; @( U! e% L4 A10.1, e8 _2 r8 I* F; H
Sheet n. 337& G& X# `; g( s+ R
Page 1(1)
" ~6 c- J1 \+ y' Y' ?& X2 lSubject:
1 y$ o8 `4 G Y7 J2 v1 ?1 SIntegrity of clearances and- P" M* t q# A( ?" s
creepage distances
/ L4 i# n" X! ?& \0 nKey words:% o5 A' k; j6 P+ M1 z
- Clearances distances1 `) o! t6 }$ S! ]# ]( d
- Creepage distances
6 U3 [+ e0 O( I# E2 Z! O/ JDecision n. 23 taken at/ {. r5 U- F2 k5 @
37th meeting/2000
8 v+ y0 U' Q$ i v, \Question:: O: N+ v# Y- Q o U( D* X
Strict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.) E8 z" X* L% j7 d% Z* f( r! l6 I
How is this clause considered for compliance?
+ R+ e3 J! v) j. i R! f7 ZThis question is from CTL.
3 W/ a' b: l; i, t" G; ?0 _4 KDecision:
* x: @- n9 h% ]See Explanatory Notes4 z4 }+ Z$ d3 u
Explanatory Notes:
' U, M0 d4 H8 u" L: V2 T! T3 ^The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to" Z6 u( F4 z8 L4 B( p
ensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then1 b7 g7 q+ Y/ U. C1 {' q
further tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for x8 C4 f( Z V* w
the creepage and clearance distances.; A1 Y# G5 u0 n* s& q6 ^$ s
/ m7 F4 F1 U9 Q, y/ v8 @9 y1 a2 _& D( K4 `
( a" v8 S) N, o
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？注册安规
x
|
/1 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-9-19 13:45
收藏
分享
好帖
鸡蛋
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡