|
| DSH 281# W# M7 h2 ?; L9 ~* O% H
6 H6 N! m* M. G* R6 k | Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19
3 b- N% U, W0 k0 n% m | 19.11.2
+ l+ G/ o% C; r8 s% v | 60335-1(ed.3)
0 |. A! E, K- ^7 Q; o4 Z$ X | 5 V5 q6 Z! |' |0 d1 v. k2 \; }/ ]* [) V
Standard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 281+ j" r0 c' ^7 K
Page 1(1)
e# U" l/ d i7 I, h) t- ySubject: Open circuit of conductor- R1 a# W# n/ I5 Z1 R
of PCB during tests of clause 190 F5 `6 I& X, E
Key words:
4 O9 e$ {* b0 g! @2 T& V% _( _- PCB
V. O7 s( a( O! S' X( CConductor
. t0 x Z8 `& T( S- ^6 R( R, _Decision n. 20 taken
0 C1 Q* A7 b$ ?At 36th meeting/1999! s- ?) \! y7 \9 @
Question: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up
1 v1 Q; B+ u" T4 K3 H) ^2 T6 rTaking into account that:$ q/ W6 v2 K3 P. T
- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,
& n; G2 e) Z! y$ x0 c+ J- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances, i, d& k" o3 P- O6 N! ~; D
below the required values
/ M2 [' f9 z- y$ s5 @1 u& A6 z- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor+ Y( C) ~3 D0 i! W$ ?: F
bridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,
1 j: X Y" P% Z$ v5 C7 K; D) Iare the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?
' ~# c% h9 r7 G1 aDecision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the
2 \( J; T9 N/ Y0 C& p- J7 yPCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit.
7 E( J% }% e9 p' @2 hThis can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
% S0 w% B% r/ wsame conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is
+ J- ^7 z5 @" \; L6 f; a3 K1 l: {defined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.- ]* e/ h9 t& S- c4 n3 y
; L q0 |6 a( G. D: K! f% D+ ]
. y" {+ q/ s$ E7 n! q$ W |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|