|
在60335-2-23中的25.14有如下内容:" e. P6 ^" R4 f
25.14 Addition:6 g( q& Q4 G1 z7 b. k9 e$ r& J
The force applied to the supply cord of appliances provided with a swivel connection is9 ~( u$ _% t3 D4 c, W. _
– 20 N, for cords having a nominal cross-sectional area exceeding 0,75 mm2;
. U6 e" s% w) W1 f+ M; b# X– 10 N, for other cords.( n9 u+ e0 n6 k U' s
Hand-held appliances are additionally tested while mounted on an apparatus similar to that
4 H2 s( ~7 ^% C# N- A/ u4 Qof Figure 8 with the supply cord hanging vertically and loaded with a force of 10 N. The
- E, F- ?) F0 h2 y1 _" P% woscillating part of the apparatus is moved through an angle of 180° and back to the original
3 `$ |2 z: \, O. e8 z: {$ ~. xposition. The number of flexings is 4 000, the rate of flexing being 6 per min.
4 Y6 G Q3 f4 E" U4 U9 d& s# l( yNOTE 101 The appliance is mounted so that the direction of flexing corresponds to that most likely to occur when
" j5 t* M- q0 ^8 h X( T$ gthe supply cord is wound around the appliance for storage.
2 c* B% q- @8 E! Z( vNOTE 102 This test is not carried out on appliances incorporating a swivel connection.' P# N5 M. {7 ]& L
$ l1 {4 j9 |* ]6 H; e# W8 H
章节一开头就提到对带有回旋接头的电源线在做摇摆测试时所需要承受的力的要求,
' n$ h8 u# w) K: _/ |但最后的NOTE2那里却说带有回旋接头的器具不需要进行电源线摇摆测试,这不是相互矛盾吗?还是说我的理解有误,求大神解答。谢谢!$ c3 `* G( P/ O% U$ u$ P
|
|