|
本帖最后由 terry20120318 于 2012-11-27 16:56 编辑 + Q) `6 |% o' q
: A5 k7 A4 o+ M
# n8 E! b+ X4 O4 \2 _3 J; {( m5 z8 a& v, @, ~$ ^$ f
Question:
6 Y: @6 W' ~& p% g0 b$ cHow a product should be marked and/or classified when it consists of a set of:8 }. m0 m$ O6 ^$ @# F2 k
1. An independent control gear (Class I or Class II) with SELV output
5 d( K$ h( `) J% T1 f/ f6 m; kand
) ^3 e, H/ u9 q5 K3 H2. A luminaire (one or more) which is detachable from the control gear (by hand)?9 U7 n2 b$ X$ Y8 d% k3 N; n
Decision:
, E, {2 ]7 D0 o* g, L9 H- Z- The independent control gear shall be classified as Class I or Class II;
# m9 q% G6 x, ^9 X- The luminaire shall be marked as Class III;
& S/ g3 c/ a' I3 g6 K5 a9 r8 X- The whole product may be marked as Class I or Class II on the package. Another way is to mark
8 t+ _; S k: {% k, j$ Q. z ]the package with the rated voltages of the control gear and the luminaire. Class III marking on the
. R$ }/ ? O" y6 v2 m! Opackage may be misleading, and if applied alone, the marking will be incorrect;
6 Q [* c2 P3 `! ]( q) x- The control gear shall be tested according to Class I or Class II and the luminaire according to2 c( D; C- I/ \6 r3 H
Class III.
b) l5 z; X- _5 y$ mExplanatory Notes:# Y! C, n" |# O/ X% b
: t6 _7 R; ]/ h2 ?, J
) ~% _! W* s n3 I, l! J各位前辈,请教下此份决议# L. G+ ^8 ^1 X6 [( z
从决议看,认证时可以出一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,然后放在一个包装箱内出货,是这个意思吧,没有讲一定要按整体做一个二类灯具的证书,只是包装箱上做标示即可。; q) h. l: g5 k9 I* S
如果是的话,分开出证,有利于公司 以后更换电源供应商。# r2 [5 K$ V/ _) N
第二,一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,放在一个包装箱内出货,欧洲海关会不会认为有问题,1 z$ X' G5 G, v5 z( N* N4 x+ C+ h
4 F2 U! u0 \6 y. n- [( e' o; Q2 t6 _* }
多谢回复
6 J) L4 ^! z( o# l7 P
4 v- V$ I' x" X0 P! ^ t |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|