|
| DSH 252A
) g9 `" r1 l1 T) J1 m) @4 ]$ D: ?
% A5 \( X7 {/ l" |+ S | Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment3 ~% K, K( M: V# T- \! C
| 2.2.10 and 26.1% y1 Y% {3 Q) D' u5 S( p1 C
| 60335-1(ed.2)
% a2 j8 _# R) ^* |4 _/ h! w) \ |
# l6 r0 |. e8 ~1 V) [8 T6 |Standard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition ) E% Y6 v9 s+ j" s. {$ R$ T Z
Sub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1
/ ~7 `, T/ v4 d4 h8 ~5 T% j" Q d- f# SSheet n. 252 A
3 o7 |, ]7 A; W1 _" pSubject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
; L& p0 S% y; Q, j/ t9 }* z6 q9 }1 DKey words:
/ f6 m: e( H1 l, m- crimp connection4 {# f) \$ w1 A3 F8 t
- type M attachment2 C8 m: F0 a @$ w- X! z0 m# [
Decision 13 of 34th meeting/1997
' {* {2 w3 q# _4 W$ K0 a& g$ y- PQuestion:
3 N) `# H) y- Z# M+ _8 hSubclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,
2 K9 q: S( C# p* M* n+ {9 Land6 q) i# O8 ]' d$ }
subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z) e6 \* X0 S0 ^/ U1 g
attachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
+ \2 P: w7 r% H" z1 N& g) Sconnection of external conductors”
7 @8 p, x+ a1 ~- |& o5 _ NIs there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
8 _: N. B8 u% l2 eof crimp connections in type M attachment?
/ g' |' t m8 |% U% I5 @! v1 k" oAre crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?- H0 J% N/ M7 k
Decision:% y! y- I5 a" p4 o6 Y
- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1# z. G$ Z) v; r3 K
refers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.
8 n3 b8 w$ M# H8 c- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see
2 C& ^! W7 w, p+ J1 v* t5 [sketch below).3 @6 u7 Z( A; Q
, Z9 s+ H7 K( C& w" [
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|