|
| DSH 605
( G# n3 n, b" u) @* d; g
8 L0 }3 q. i" U | Abnormal operation4 t$ X+ t( h) h9 n7 d3 n) y. z
| 19- n" `+ I( ]) o8 u# ^+ ?" @4 V; h
| 60335-1(ed.4)
- Q8 F: n- X3 s6 n2 }6 V6 k |
, k$ ]5 d0 @) O1 {' y" \8 p7 ?& WQuestion:
' w" ~) U! ]5 c" \- Y' h: aMany part two Standards introduce additional sub-clauses for clause 19 and these are numbered 19.101, 19.102 etc.- _( K8 g) f: _, R4 p/ @: {# v
These sub-clauses are published in the Standards at the end of clause 19, after the sub-clause 19.13.
* C% S+ G; y+ ?* LShould these additional sub-clauses be conducted after the assessment and tests0 r: u) J% E Q$ `' A, R0 M+ V
of sub-clause 19.13, or should sub-clause 19.13 be conducted as the last test of clause 19?* E' D( Y6 q# ~$ g2 f. g9 Y
Decision:
7 N5 m3 j* f5 E$ ], ]* pAccording to 19.1 the compliance criteria is included in 19.13 for all 19 sub-clauses, unless otherwise is specified in the sub-clause of the relevant part 2 or if it is evident that this sub-clause have its own compliance criteria and 19.13 is not applicable.4 V9 F) r3 {9 R" |; G. p3 ^
& A1 n* T( H: g, q6 D# C! C
4 [9 J" y: N b! k' \6 x. Q% V" I. Q9 W, O |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|