|
| DSH 597' N" T( s) t K0 ~9 d1 P4 k
% `0 v+ n" s' f0 n" A | Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator% H& |1 z' S& S4 C, w/ L
| 8.3.3.9
( i9 Z8 _2 \* U# S4 r3 S( j c | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
4 `" [, k7 h8 M- C0 x' L9 I; P4 i |
/ ^* ^5 P1 R# z5 uStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
0 F" p8 T, i h2
' B7 c- ]$ F2 I% Z) rSub clause(s):
9 l# r- q& R0 C8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and
, ~3 f8 T# x1 K: c# W8 @( S' N8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2- y& x- o X @: w
DSH
% [% y7 w$ D! s: S597/ M! ~: d' |* z* k2 V" M5 ]
Subject:! n: w0 \" P6 R; F7 R
Verification of main contact
: J8 x5 P# m) L- `3 u8 Kposition, position of the actuator
( K& r! n0 G" ]. j2 |+ F- _Key words:
/ h. N4 u0 G4 t3 z( V% ]4 B- suitable for isolation) V* ^; Z3 A+ K4 _" p ^
- indication of contact; r3 p* X% {9 ?+ w8 ^$ E! Z
position
7 X+ e: y+ w2 g1 Z9 _* G6 s0 U6 hDecision approved by$ {9 I; Q/ P/ g. C
the 44th CTL Plenary
1 t6 _: m6 l3 J) ?3 A- ]6 A6 smeeting 2007. d8 B% R; y: H# o
Question:0 h4 f9 Z$ D+ f& m* {1 m+ u3 O# f
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an5 `1 H2 c$ @. A: t% s
additional requirement to be verified.
0 g' m* N& ~" r% S4 d* s ~9 bQ1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is1 V$ ?9 T; G8 t1 q
neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a; a9 S8 x! }6 @$ v4 @
pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?; H6 F7 R1 x' m3 U m
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
$ W5 J4 C9 Y+ n6 [' L$ @7 o+ X) pshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?
1 X4 P8 l e* g* F* DProposal:
9 S; `) K: m0 B9 i( w: {There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:
! O: Q% A! ]& E& E; P4 X/ S1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
: d, u1 S1 O" C2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a3 E6 B5 z" V( L% u0 q; R) I# I: x
separate position indicator.( x/ H" t1 c- p& V) ^% J$ I( B
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable2 I2 K' h6 i. ]1 ^
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
: F$ Y5 g0 H) K* o$ f3 \indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the U) y. ^2 y7 D' k: B7 x* G
actuator." N3 j' s4 w; h- R0 K7 X0 x1 g8 s
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1. Z- J4 N7 b7 t
4 P* d; K" T% t7 h3 M6 d0 T8 L7 [! z1 |6 U2 D! }; |5 r" ~
* H9 P' R P8 p. F3 b |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|