|
| DSH 597
. d! k/ b3 w6 z$ t, N g* a9 x) v7 G$ i5 s
| Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator9 {( K1 L3 w% d% S2 z# h
| 8.3.3.97 a8 a" E( l7 ]- h
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
% v/ m6 l6 i) J% X3 N: T# _$ h | - S4 ]# |2 Y) i, g$ r, {
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-3 q1 E% u, B L. T1 x3 ], i
2# A5 n, c/ _& x: J o+ R( R
Sub clause(s):/ z! v7 _. a" W5 R# q) c4 n
8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and& J& a7 G( S1 R4 E- ^# U6 u1 y6 z0 E
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
. Y. L' l8 J4 J# ]- VDSH: Z( i- y) G' R1 Z
597% L2 i4 E; _; ^6 Z
Subject:9 Z2 D+ Z% d" r7 E$ V
Verification of main contact
E; K/ \6 R b* f* h! y3 Gposition, position of the actuator$ |$ P0 d6 ]: e) r
Key words:0 b1 _. \; u* M# b! _2 f# ~. B2 u/ m
- suitable for isolation8 ]% k3 H ?- S; [% ?
- indication of contact
6 t' G( I# L/ F8 Sposition5 g5 p7 w3 v! Q1 c( @' W& p
Decision approved by T( I3 P" @7 Q- ?" M, ?
the 44th CTL Plenary T) e( \1 k% ?/ n; w7 x, o, Z
meeting 2007. B2 W+ E7 a% x1 I( R8 G, b2 q& _/ j
Question:6 u6 b' w# `3 M- Y* b0 [
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an+ L6 r" T( b. P; w7 [
additional requirement to be verified.8 F$ t6 q S8 A4 Y5 D
Q1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is& D+ k2 l! O9 s. ?
neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a: q8 V! c7 F& w
pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?* ~8 e' t- s# k' I# Q
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
" z& j( ^7 x4 [& P" y3 t% m" T5 Fshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?3 z' w6 M0 j" V/ k
Proposal:- {/ q! j; `$ S, k T' P1 ^$ A
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:
% ]$ P( o7 U$ v' v$ Z1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or0 ?. x! A U. e% m
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a% b0 x7 z' c4 J7 n' W" `% E
separate position indicator.+ t7 p5 x* c* Z+ `( j) \
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable% H, T& \1 @9 Q0 a/ |
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
) a( z2 b p; _% Mindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the
$ N% I3 M- E( ]) y8 y+ ?+ o Yactuator., {# j; G) M) h8 G7 X J$ D# C
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
! U. O; ^: t) s
1 {6 } Q/ x t+ s+ w. b6 B0 [0 p' ~
: U- l* y0 E2 [+ P+ j9 _; ]+ H
1 ?. u, I& f L, E6 ]* a9 @ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|