安规网

 找回密码
 注册安规
安规论坛 | 仪器设备 | 求职招聘 | 国家标准 公告 | 教程 | 家电 | 灯具 | 环保 | ITAV 签到 充值 在线 打卡 设备 好友| 帖子| 空间| 日志| 相册
IP淋雨机 | 证书查询 | 规范下载 | 资质查询 招聘 | 考试 | 线缆 | 玩具 | 标准 | 综 合 红包 邮箱 打卡 工资 禁言 分享| 记录| 道具| 勋章| 任务
水平垂直燃烧机 | 针焰 | 灼热丝 | 漏电起痕
IP防水防尘设备|拉力机|恒温恒湿|标准试验指
灯头量规|插头量规|静风烤箱|电池设备|球压
万年历 | 距端午节还有
自2007年5月10日,安规网已运行
IP淋雨设备| 恒温恒湿箱| 拉力机| 医疗检测设备沙特Saber 埃及COI 中东GCC|CoC直接发证机构水平垂直燃烧机|灼热丝|针焰试验机|漏电起痕试验机
灯头量规|试验指|插头插座量规|灯具检测设备耐划痕试验机|可程式恒温恒湿试验箱 | 耦合器设备广东安规-原厂生产-满足标准-审核无忧
查看: 745|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[PROT] DSH 437 Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-7 19:31 | 显示全部楼层 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
广东安规检测
有限公司提供:
DSH 437: ?* ]1 K. Z/ L+ D! R
7 {! s) x: K6 B1 F' W
Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m5 S4 V- q+ f. J- k& {1 r3 [$ k. M( S
9.12.13
; N7 K1 a: X) G. c3 W. B% w
61009-1(ed.2)4 T3 P7 X/ [2 m

0 m' [2 H' I7 v8 {9 k) H# QStandard:) U1 C6 D! ?8 J
IEC 61009-1 (1996-12)9 z/ s4 r! C* }# y- D: B, f. Z& }
Sub clause:
+ d0 e+ N: C& u2 h- e9.12.139 A  R! @, u' _% o
Sheet No. 437% `) L, }, |( i4 i* C- l
Subject
( L$ z4 b5 U% |& DVerification of the rated residual
8 C3 R0 Z. c2 i+ P" \) U; g+ zmaking and breaking capacity IDm
7 E, k- E/ C% A- _  A3 j% iKey words: Confirmed at CTL
8 s2 M) m; B/ W! e5 I39th Meeting# P; w4 A' X7 d% ]8 |0 O5 N6 I
Question:
. n: B# E3 g7 Q3 P$ _# L! e( b/ d9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall9 I& G1 P" u- t) h% ]
not be used.
% q% @( e: S+ J4 z' R- v9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
/ p( Z; b  x+ S* ]/ k" F9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance; ]: j! ?/ l& u
Z2 to be used.
0 n" M- r) K) ^According to these figures the following inconsistency appears:6 m! b$ ^, O4 X
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual5 N8 H9 ?: U5 }0 \$ W
making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.; x0 q: a# t7 U  l
For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking7 X+ i. h1 X2 s
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.1 t0 }3 X( p' t) N& A, a. h
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
9 O) A8 w& L- G: kcapacity has to be tested at 400 V.
/ `. i/ [- y- }; g: sFor a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
$ g+ }1 J7 l- [400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.  L# c2 }. }- O. q1 W7 y
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
+ n  [) Z/ i* h; A) F* m" R! Kthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
; k7 X, U9 y+ Y230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.- ?9 w% r- G4 z
Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:" y% z& \0 y/ _& [; n6 }+ [7 A
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
* r) k  v. U" \9 Q9 b; [1 x; C, gSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3
$ H  \3 d1 A7 k2 pThe proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
3 Z1 W" y  t" c: F* O: ~. v) e) SWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this% p5 c" w: l1 ]4 i7 b
important decision.$ G  T  f+ d1 l* i4 Y1 N0 d3 \4 z
Therefore the following statement was drafted:7 b) m( K6 P  F
2
$ q5 U5 I# i2 cDecision to be forwarded to CTL:
2 ~4 X( ?6 V$ y+ h# S+ u! dIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause5 F% x* B8 M7 a. E) w1 v8 E% n
9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
6 F" u& t; W6 z7 Q6 ymaking and breaking capacity IDm.2 w- ^( f+ \9 W1 H
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the: f3 T: B9 _& n- A9 C2 z9 T: k1 D; K
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will1 u+ |/ B: F/ E, P. s
be included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
, H) h' ]$ K1 Z. _2 H( AThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.) V- M, }- T5 Q; f+ \
" c6 O/ T. N! |3 {
  W. x6 E0 d, [& N( T' [( B# Z

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册安规

本版积分规则

关闭

安规网为您推荐上一条 /1 下一条

QQ|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网 ( 粤ICP13023453-10 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-13 01:24 , Processed in 0.125057 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.|广东安规赞助

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表