|
' l4 w# O7 {2 y5 f2 y6 ]" q; r) D& Q7 [9 f8 d3 E! i" N' r/ P% ?
DSH 7535 o- ^: A4 d, }- d
|
| Capacitor discharge voltage measurement4 }& l% Y3 x4 Y3 G* c( M+ p. F
| 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)6 J8 ~+ A# m0 L7 c1 |& N
| 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7); R5 c' H# s6 c7 a( h; @. D8 U
| / G5 U1 T( U7 e
0 B- Y2 V0 n) y9 p7 Q, D; O- jStandard(s): No. Year) ^' K0 ^" V1 I+ K5 g' T; W
IEC60065/2001
5 W5 c, S6 m y# c' L8 j" G3 h" @# HIEC61010-1/2001
: q6 {+ t0 z4 i. {) r8 ^2009 DSH 0753 TRON, MEASCategory:
. S) ]* u8 C# ^' y7 D5 w9.1.6Subclause(s):
6 }1 _1 G0 L0 U) D* H6.10.35 ]) I$ q' w/ n6 j/ G, I+ p. Q4 H2 b9 i
Developed by:
8 s" n# Z3 f( ^# Q, {* J9 ?WG4, ETF2, ETF3. Z5 U. p! Y' n5 K! m: h- F
Subject:
! ]/ \) R- S% e$ A, I) T2 WCapacitor discharge9 k* P( U# w6 y7 P) u- w) J \
voltage measurement
& Y! T! e6 x* A( uKey words:
5 B3 ~. P3 J& {- \- Plug discharge
/ w, n4 @# M( M) G9 p- Capacitor discharge0 ?7 C) G i' B& V) y/ f9 \- A5 M
- Shock hazard d1 Q) I5 w' f4 V# r% k, U6 B" j
Approved at the 47th CTL
( r+ ?' Q7 @( x& WPlenary Meeting, year 2010
5 B" B3 h' b5 t) z+ ~/ L& xQuestion:
& e2 R, S8 e7 i! NThe standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor2 ?- J/ p" b* M8 @# p3 A
discharge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and% @3 _4 o8 c% S1 H7 N2 w
measuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of# L# `/ u- Y* w3 H2 C r2 e
the referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time* z x1 D) v! D$ m5 {
specified.' G3 j7 @( X5 J% L8 B6 U5 U
(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but
2 H/ G- q' ]% P9 Nthe intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the
. U; ?; L5 J! w/ c% b% F/ j) \8 padvent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in- P1 y) x$ U1 D% S3 k5 v0 f- s% L a, D
the AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would4 G9 T2 U& W0 t) I0 U5 _4 D. ^
result in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?
S; j* |1 L; r' R! W' _; k(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input* m0 `. c( K8 Z% {
impedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input8 E# k& H8 G8 i% b9 R8 g4 h, S
resistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more# m5 Z- r* o- F3 W3 ^8 |5 T
consistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?" P- o0 w0 h' L' y7 t: d6 s
Decision:( o Z$ y9 p1 N5 n! ^$ J0 e/ Z
(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.7 X# u, S6 }6 \2 h) |
(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within$ J4 }; _, s% I9 O9 n- T( S4 J! N& L
the CB Scheme.* H- H' X0 X1 W9 S9 l' D, P
( f% V: X& x. p; a
* A# s1 j+ g7 E: s+ k }6 Z6 n0 a& z" X
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|