|
| DSH 642, {& B* H5 P) N- ?& Z
$ ~3 ^& u5 j+ d- q( z" `" V2 e | Markings
7 f% b- ]( `, s# x* N0 e$ w | 6.1.1 q)( ]8 h/ Q; }' O9 D9 t* I+ C
| 61643-1(ed.2)
4 R' u7 b( T: B" I3 U5 m( i" X |
% M" \: Q t m: t- rStandard(s)-(year and edition):
; L5 }" J- ~/ X% E0 r4 h$ uIEC 61643-1, 2nd edition, 2005-03 E: ]% @2 L- I; Y7 O: P r
Sub clause(s):
3 ]9 w% v: L. l0 E5 @+ O9 x6.1.1 q)
) f: y G: v& o* EDSH 6424 p( i3 Y: i( ^8 t2 U6 i0 R
Subject:
& i- h2 s9 q# }. t8 ]( g: {3 t8 HMarkings2 ]5 Z0 d- \5 N/ p0 k# I3 c
Key words:
: A) l7 {' D/ n$ q4 y0 l, k- marking; ~9 _0 I& W! }% W1 _
- frequency
* p% {; V! q4 O3 |2 L$ v; I* u LApproved by the 45th CTL plenary meeting 2008- l" [, {/ E$ G% K+ {
Question:( H, u2 C/ h5 E* J: y
Is it acceptable to mark only the type of current (e.g. a.c. or ~), but without giving the frequency?2 P+ B% R* W1 W
Rationale:/ P0 m9 u. W- A, O
The standard itself limits to the frequency range of 48-62 Hz a.c.:# h W1 {$ N. o0 H: p) A
2.1.1 Frequency: frequency of the supply mains is between 48 Hz and 62 Hz a.c.
3 h+ u4 Z( J1 r$ zThe marking requirement in the English IEC version reads:
9 I* w/ ?# Y# a7 Z3 N6.1.1 q) Type of current: a.c. frequency or d.c., or both: u0 s$ D' D" Z+ s
The marking requirement in the French IEC version reads:
+ s9 b& |3 A" D4 F2 r" ~6.1.1 q) Le type de courant: alternatif, continu ou les deux
) ]- i v# l1 K$ xThis means only the English IEC version requires to mark the frequency.
2 n6 ~$ W# a8 R+ _Decision:, A2 L8 T/ ~9 |) M: H' L
YES, it is acceptable to mark only the type of current (e.g. a.c. or ~) without giving the frequency, as the frequency is limited to the range of 48-62 Hz anyway and there is no safety implication.3 q& Q0 ?( a7 T" o
3 [0 P$ O- F7 a6 O. h0 M9 B6 ~8 t5 }0 r( x1 b
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|