|
Normally, there are three cases for your question:
1 @6 ^+ }5 @( f4 q2 i3 w4 z% m1. Actually the material is not changed, and the UL file No.(Exxxxx) is also not changed,just the manufacturer's name is changed because of the merging of these two factories, don't afraid of this case, deliver this information to UL engineer, no additional tests and reevaluation are needed, and at this time, you can explain to the UL field representative about this case, I think most the UL auditor can accept this case without reconfirmation...0 i& z" a9 O5 O. J ~
2. Actually the material is not changed, but the UL file No. and the manufacturer's name are changed cause of the merging of these two factories, at this time you must deliver this information to the UL engineer, but I still think it only needs paper work for UL engineer, and you also can persuade the UL factory auditor (field representive) to temporarily accept this case for one time.: v; i7 M: A- I% `$ p5 E3 I, W
3. Actually the material is changed, including the Model/Type No., UL file No., and the manufacuturer's name, at this time a VN must issued by the UL autior, and you must send new samples to the UL engineer to reevaluate this change, as for the tests, the UL engineer will decide whether some tests need to be done, or not.& F( ^1 x+ [. ?: |$ ]
" [) T: _2 N5 h. m
so which case suits you? |
|