|
| DSH 437
5 R2 \$ ?9 S+ C3 S
5 q U/ e' t6 W% T' P( }0 Q% Y | Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m
" g+ c0 B; T0 l | 9.12.13" i' S: E. l3 w& ~( |
| 61009-1(ed.2)
R1 V8 g0 h! }1 S6 ?; p7 |7 D | 2 r( q* I! b4 S1 C, r: m. @ I
Standard:$ K& F5 h, O7 Q
IEC 61009-1 (1996-12)
+ D. T% f0 \0 [$ l( OSub clause:
6 h) T6 N6 }9 R! w/ P$ P u9.12.13
+ B8 ]) ^( ?$ A, y5 WSheet No. 437/ E+ A( G7 t/ v6 u0 Y
Subject
/ O8 ?' H/ }) A& f4 W+ S2 s: GVerification of the rated residual' \! z4 Q/ F2 A- Y: ?. p* I
making and breaking capacity IDm
1 g/ q5 v! V3 ^" h3 p& X3 @( cKey words: Confirmed at CTL5 K* I( y% `- Y& v2 N
39th Meeting X/ x$ Y; B, J5 A
Question:
7 s" J# I7 p: P0 ?3 I9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall6 R- ?5 ^2 x# |, a
not be used.5 S- ^3 r* b1 H) v1 y
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
% W# K. E7 \5 P8 B2 E9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance" p; t+ B& k. p; i; U
Z2 to be used.4 h% t# l k! B6 ~) P/ |
According to these figures the following inconsistency appears:: t9 a) @. z1 J0 ~6 y2 K
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
6 C- i" Z- k# Q! W% x Qmaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
: D8 [9 p9 }9 ?For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking% J! ~7 R+ d+ A$ S1 _5 m+ R
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.2 g0 r" G! m v" Z! {9 A9 r6 A4 s
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking: w6 F) _* m. u) y
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.. [: {* |% G" p( z% g. u' M
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
8 X9 w% T4 }- l( T. o* D400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.. L5 F! Q. k4 H t, X
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
2 e/ d9 c: N% hthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be* J2 }) d: A) {# f+ s
230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
; V: T6 u4 u! xDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:2 o0 E; U5 l! h1 `) V
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
( Q. ]2 F" @# J1 kSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.33 W% H# }: `$ K0 E; Y: f
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting# C9 U3 ]* p+ Y v/ q- X
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
* x* o* ]3 @" K+ u2 t& B8 Nimportant decision.
4 \! J5 I! L' z2 tTherefore the following statement was drafted:
: v* D. i3 f4 ~ X! B {0 v2
5 P, D N8 g" a$ c/ o0 zDecision to be forwarded to CTL:
$ ?' U( C( g+ X: i# XIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
~' y a5 S9 Z9 x9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
/ O* x9 S+ P" I9 D- _6 Q2 `8 nmaking and breaking capacity IDm.% m* z$ }5 U! ?+ T0 s5 I9 U
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the0 Q& }% e! C$ }
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
0 ?- p% |; M6 d7 A, K' Nbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
. {5 G0 m/ G2 u& \7 uThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.
8 ?5 I1 R/ u+ f; \$ E2 u! {7 d
5 j- p W# J# V0 u. t$ O3 j$ k7 _8 P. ~" P7 r* [ c2 L3 m
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|