|
| DSH 399- d6 [% M' P+ y! M# q
1 o _6 S7 M+ @% F | Component impedance* T4 _& k# _" T2 e& @% ?& O
| 17a) and 17g): n0 H1 m+ I# J2 [( w- A
| 60601-1(ed.2);am1;am2* l( k7 W2 p K, n% D" T
| . F& z% X, r; ]
Standard(s)- (year and edition):
* I- W, _# s8 q3 M; TIEC 60601-1:1988 Ed.2 Am1+Am2* k2 t. u& C- q$ [# z
Sub clause(s): 17 a) and 17 g)
1 |" N4 z+ b' Z! Q' k6 wSheet n°: DSH-399) E- C' ]6 G" e" |9 N8 p2 Y0 H. O
Subject: Component impedance& k4 W( A) K' z% K' j# G6 G9 @
Key words: Component impedance, high integrity/ z2 \ f, u9 i9 {8 B0 Z
Confirmed by CTL at its 39th meeting, in Cologne
5 Z# `2 s7 B, s' C2 E v( p: }! nQuestion:2 g- }8 h. X5 j
Component impedance is generally unreliable. Components certified to IEC 60384-14 etc. can5 U6 d9 n! B& i/ I
be considered of high integrity. Is the impedance of a component sufficient? Does investigation3 N& ^! \' R, J- z: B8 M# T7 Z8 Z
of the product require further review of AIR CLEARANCE and CREEPAGE DISTANCE for such
# R: T6 r: I3 B D5 I2 @a component? Does this sub-clause mean that further component review is not required?
4 ?, d$ x3 d5 s& j& l: cDecision:3 M" @7 ^2 G% j% n
Secondary circuits providing protective means after short-circuiting of inadequate AIR
" `% w7 {/ l( U9 s" `/ f. h; vCLEARANCE and CREEPAGE DISTANCE must be investigated. Failure of components in6 r( I0 E" @: z: q2 K
these circuits shall be investigated as a SINGLE FAULT CONDITION
0 U+ g$ `! C1 i- i+ @
: K( Z; `, N' _0 R7 z0 x4 x9 T0 _) F- @+ T
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|