|
| PDSH 9738 W( x5 \# g8 W. V+ D; ~+ D
# W6 X' L5 t5 c# N4 p | Flux measurement tolerances& D% G, b! T4 {: c' Y! v' Q
| 22.16
& D; }; q# @% W' R | 60598-2-22(ed.3);am1;am29 ?& ?2 O0 M4 `6 y
| " k% X# N6 l% T# p
Standard(s):# k9 ?, w+ j0 }8 j8 c
IEC 60598-2-22/1997 A1/2002 A2/20082 r7 T! N, U1 a
Subclause(s): 22.16/ p$ \! I- }' {, h8 |( S
No. Year PDSH 0973 2010( W; S) ?7 X9 S
Category: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM8 H6 @: u3 u. g4 F6 A! M
Subject:
8 k ^. ~# A8 @7 FFlux measurement tolerances
' x/ D" g. Y: b6 v2 Y& u8 gKey words:
+ B0 V- J* g$ l- Follow up tests
2 g9 e% ]6 t% k* m4 ]- 10% difference
( P/ K: X7 J$ ~1 C% i- Type tests
8 k# h2 ]7 j, m4 T& j) eTo be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012
2 D% b6 W4 w5 n, U$ c1 tQuestion:) \$ P1 t; L& z
When photometric testing is performed to verify the rated flux in emergency mode, we are often faced
1 b; b0 } ]- N7 ywith differences between our results and those stated by the manufacturer. According to our experiences,
' u! }$ {! t8 L. mthis is quite normal if we take into account the series of uncertainties which affect a photometric
* Y* j5 r8 z7 u- l, wmeasurement: different lamps used by Test Houses and manufacturers, production tolerances as regards
; `4 T* F) |$ a4 y7 G) \+ U" Dbattery and inverter, different testing methodologies, etc. What is the maximum difference allowed so that
: g0 x0 E1 U' r$ j9 `the value declared by the manufacturer is deemed correct?, r4 C; v" K- N+ G( ^
Decision:
, T( h1 T, c' EFor follow up test, 10% difference is acceptable. For type tests, no tolerance allowed.
$ c4 V/ A/ ]* F1 g+ M9 h5 F9 \; ?. c3 w+ r, \1 s
8 q3 o& y( X& }, k( M! r# m
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|