|
| DSH 437- \0 j3 s% W5 w: l" I3 G! ]- o
) v |( o9 n/ q) Q
| Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m# I4 ^+ k) [! C
| 9.12.13
# ^* G3 M9 S5 S, V' M9 n! J | 61009-1(ed.2)
0 L% t5 \2 ]( P, U) X | 1 [: `( V( k1 F, W2 R5 Q* g
Standard:
E, u5 V% b6 i3 ZIEC 61009-1 (1996-12)9 [. |( F9 ~- @
Sub clause:/ E1 L' k3 g' v8 V v0 C- P7 A
9.12.13
# V* Q. u3 B; m7 S1 G8 ?: kSheet No. 437. M) ?; W/ d0 K+ V# m& P6 t
Subject
) n# m2 }/ W7 t4 `7 e5 IVerification of the rated residual
}) M) _+ J9 F7 C8 T( o+ umaking and breaking capacity IDm
' s# C7 _4 B- JKey words: Confirmed at CTL. b$ f5 B3 s. q1 w
39th Meeting
: C5 [4 n( S) ]/ WQuestion:
: F1 V$ C \2 ?1 z* Y9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall6 b2 m' A1 S5 c
not be used.; O& f/ h# o! p4 P( q8 k( a
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
" s4 b7 L' q; w. ^9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance: _, {* i3 |; q6 d& y6 P4 _
Z2 to be used.; _- J/ k. Y; l; D" i( X
According to these figures the following inconsistency appears:
9 o7 O% H9 w' Y9 k; J- z# d) \9 dFor a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
; W5 n# R$ u# q; lmaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
' N9 f9 o w' FFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking* f+ e1 R3 I: A6 Y/ ~1 T3 R8 }
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.) D" n7 F/ `, a! b
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
. B0 s% ]; B' L1 @' B7 Ucapacity has to be tested at 400 V.- h, Y, m8 @; a( j
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
" l) @# w" g. Y% z+ E* W- S400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V." t# T7 H7 Z7 q* y
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,, ~. i- E9 M0 @2 ~0 ^6 B
the test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
8 y! f( i& G; b/ C; U: m+ Y( G' `230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
/ ]# S$ f) t$ a. y& ?% H6 C* r+ xDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:
9 d3 O( n9 l( g: h5 RExtract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:. l9 E8 ~7 C6 q
SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3
* L Y! f& a0 u$ `, w3 z- a( _ vThe proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting* h5 T/ S1 b3 ?* p% j
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this9 X3 j J) R0 ]2 K8 s2 L
important decision.1 H* z/ ]$ F9 y0 e0 V
Therefore the following statement was drafted:
# X0 y( z& y& Y. f/ A2
% Z- C) @ w- P, p0 z$ ^Decision to be forwarded to CTL:- K' q+ M7 M9 r" U" T1 u; w
IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause* T5 x5 o; ~" f# M+ I2 j
9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
2 f; J* @, U. r& Dmaking and breaking capacity IDm.
/ J4 R; K) [" b6 |7 p6 KThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the
/ |; V1 x5 f' ^line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will" v# v g# N, J
be included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.9 W" }) y+ W+ R& ?% P! S
The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.. y4 M7 }5 O4 X
) @8 }- W( O5 U5 m; m% R: l" i, B1 g" H K) X
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|