安规网

 找回密码
 注册安规
安规论坛 | 仪器设备 | 求职招聘 | 国家标准 公告 | 教程 | 家电 | 灯具 | 环保 | ITAV 签到 充值 在线 打卡 设备 好友| 帖子| 空间| 日志| 相册
IP淋雨机 | 证书查询 | 规范下载 | 资质查询 招聘 | 考试 | 线缆 | 玩具 | 标准 | 综 合 红包 邮箱 打卡 工资 禁言 分享| 记录| 道具| 勋章| 任务
水平垂直燃烧机 | 针焰 | 灼热丝 | 漏电起痕
IP防水防尘设备|拉力机|恒温恒湿|标准试验指
灯头量规|插头量规|静风烤箱|电池设备|球压
万年历 | 距端午节还有
自2007年5月10日,安规网已运行
IP淋雨设备| 恒温恒湿箱| 拉力机| 医疗检测设备沙特Saber 埃及COI 中东GCC|CoC直接发证机构水平垂直燃烧机|灼热丝|针焰试验机|漏电起痕试验机
灯头量规|试验指|插头插座量规|灯具检测设备耐划痕试验机|可程式恒温恒湿试验箱 | 耦合器设备广东安规-原厂生产-满足标准-审核无忧
查看: 749|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[PROT] DSH 437 Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-7 19:31 | 显示全部楼层 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
广东安规检测
有限公司提供:
DSH 437
! h, Z: `9 Q; E. k3 o2 J2 M
1 d' V# J3 J: I, \: K$ q3 }$ o; z
Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m
7 |, z2 ?- \* C' Z) \2 ?4 L8 R6 f5 R
9.12.13! F, p9 `( r, \5 P! V
61009-1(ed.2)
2 ~6 t+ w. D( b/ k5 e

  n  ?1 Q" u, E2 {* n& tStandard:
$ a/ \9 s6 r4 F& j, r; mIEC 61009-1 (1996-12)
9 C5 r  v1 E$ F+ e; CSub clause:
3 ?* t( \$ @6 D/ j+ P/ ^/ c8 P9.12.13! W: h, B! Q  A, v
Sheet No. 437
: b5 r6 L! Y/ {% q, OSubject
  W# A  \" W% [) WVerification of the rated residual
& a2 S; h+ e  [! r) ~+ s# D, ?making and breaking capacity IDm
9 @  J0 [" x$ s: MKey words: Confirmed at CTL
8 L5 h- E2 B$ e! T1 U8 `39th Meeting' |( B5 F" ~  h% Q  a9 R1 t
Question:
" N$ c8 B* L$ b4 V9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall
9 L9 E* c$ ]% i- ]# C, H$ snot be used.2 G/ F; o( S8 L) G& S
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.- |& `, `3 B: C: n
9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance7 \! {# s9 Q' O- j4 [/ [9 K
Z2 to be used.
( \8 D! b1 h+ P$ Y9 oAccording to these figures the following inconsistency appears:& Q9 J6 ]7 n! Y
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual& W) e% l5 f6 W- \1 q  @) V
making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
! b& V3 L7 Z+ }7 s- W0 |8 R  RFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
) ]6 y$ |' T" m( k+ k. K& }) ocapacity has to be tested at 400 V.
7 B2 e& e$ k; K9 D0 mFor a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
. g2 N. X! ^1 h/ C* Q! N# C1 ucapacity has to be tested at 400 V., r' E! |% C1 l  v) W! I8 W
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for# |0 p( H: W( m
400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
" t% i, ~# U, j1 O3 `5 TDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,* T$ n! C, i% J
the test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be; R( V% @* K+ z( w9 x: E% Y
230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
( M+ c3 A# e, C3 _3 W: O. |0 JDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:
  J8 V, [. ^8 H5 H" S) W. C% ~Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
+ ]) X( s5 M9 [# I+ j) B! T' CSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3
- p7 I* X6 p) k& O2 |+ OThe proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
4 ]) M# e! b. y+ S) g) G3 fWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
( F1 v) M* ?. S4 c/ |- A% iimportant decision.9 V; w9 i7 l) _: b9 |& _6 C
Therefore the following statement was drafted:
' h6 n, p$ i* z* c' O2
' ^$ ^* ~  E7 d. Q$ [Decision to be forwarded to CTL:
8 n2 g: z5 }4 t1 G% o% fIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
5 ]$ p  l+ x9 k6 B; X# y9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
' ]0 A: G' x; c' Mmaking and breaking capacity IDm.* B# f3 H, b& v/ f. w, v
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the  y) I( u8 K% f: n4 G7 Z& m
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
6 x! Z2 k5 o9 E/ [, dbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
; d* s4 D$ ]: u, X" UThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.
8 \$ J" M; f1 K6 C3 Q2 E/ i/ z' i8 f  T

) @5 N% @7 @9 j* h7 E! z

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册安规

本版积分规则

关闭

安规网为您推荐上一条 /1 下一条

QQ|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网 ( 粤ICP13023453-10 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-6 19:46 , Processed in 0.126869 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.|广东安规赞助

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表