|
|
| DSH 588
% a( X! h- J( t6 c) r" u
5 C/ }3 T) E, k8 r7 Q | Verification of main contact position, position of the handle
( t- A4 |+ ~/ | | 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-27 M7 l4 |. x% b# A& a1 {' l( l
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)
" Y- q5 k8 D5 E. y% {# l |
- F" z/ l/ p' xStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
8 V* @0 z {8 _- W2, IEC60947-3/ t( d# _5 H" p8 B
Sub clause(s):* L" T1 q% }- |, n p! _$ K
8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and, j. i1 C3 W$ A/ M. z1 {( Z
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
C. k1 o% z% o6 V+ K: s4 ZSheet No.
; C; l2 m5 @/ s0 j* v, \DSH 5882 k& A2 s. k& h: X3 e7 H
Subject:- c' J' R5 B/ z9 t
Verification of main contact
k+ u: j1 A. ?9 U7 b- Tposition, position of the handle% ~) j% a0 @& T8 G
Key words: M4 M2 t3 V3 [5 @; t! ^
- suitable for isolation1 z# E$ a# n3 c. Y2 @# q# w
- indication of contact
/ K! x; c* X5 \. ?; Sposition
* T+ Z X" {' [Decision approved
: ^4 R0 l6 V/ d/ T; Y9 L% Cduring the CTL Plenary
& H% r0 }" u3 g1 vMeeting 2006- x9 g$ v+ q* T3 y( J" b
Question:
* g, u/ P: X+ X. F* Q8 sVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an3 @- q3 p$ `* m7 {: L; H
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
( Q$ J( n- m8 p4 H+ v" N7 G; Ldiscussions
3 T" A' w5 q% P8 A- o; K# O( MQ1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which3 q: t I5 v J& f. }" y; U5 `
is not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
4 e, |5 O7 M; L' k8 UIEC60947-1?0 W3 P. G, |7 g: }; H, A7 i8 l
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
" U1 Z" ], ^8 j0 w6 Q4 f# q/ Q* cshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?3 n/ Y* g9 K$ L" E# E
Decision:& n. [3 [3 d2 F- {7 b- x
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:2 h9 M/ u' N& E1 L7 O$ `+ u
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or3 P0 `5 M3 Q( o T
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
! \) C9 l9 Q3 T K- w; o$ Q7 }separate position indicator.3 T; a- B# @1 u6 z+ K: k$ H
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable
+ `* a' B# d. ]* C9 K w8 VFor construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
1 M( l; _3 Z, r/ Iindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
! E8 [$ l% v, p( U& g: S: Sactuator./ d" l& L! q9 e, {2 z, r P) _
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.19 p: G \+ U0 L/ e' P
0 O' o8 m: R9 x4 g
$ O4 i6 W" _* J+ ]0 \' f! i |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|