|
|
| PDSH 854
: c0 f4 u, W/ w! i! N Z
R6 o' Q' v: { | Screw connections Y$ }% A$ J7 \9 n: e5 \
| 4.11.3/ G& Y7 m. E- u' ^7 }% D4 }$ z2 K
| 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7)) g% M$ L0 b9 V1 A4 _
| - V: U3 N* p( ^7 z' ^. Z
Standard(s):5 @* D8 Y% {9 l+ R
IEC 60598-1 All editions7 W9 `# ?: ~8 u2 |
Subclause(s): 4.11.3' R t9 p) G2 t* u5 W9 t
No. Year PDSH 0854 2010 g& Z" O9 v$ }
Category: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
; Z$ }# O# H5 ]3 [. F2 |; X, v( ~Subject:) f" C1 `1 Z& p% A
Screw connections# T k* G4 u9 Z- H6 n1 l- O" T
Key words:* [$ ?4 J" c q0 D
- Small “spikes”( |" ^3 b N$ o' ^* X- E( m
- Locking of screw connections1 J( [( w) h# d' P. n9 g* i
- Ballast- I3 i' k7 G4 U' b
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 20121 S5 Z, d# m! N& N" W0 i: P
Question:* L, A7 m) l5 A( J; u! c( V
Are two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?
- x7 c/ f' t9 ^: t1 r9 L. {# ]Decision:
: g' v' h7 J3 A$ L' z. v, }0 DThe solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.9 @5 K3 z4 h4 m: r
) L( C- G: x& ^6 ]5 s3 c& s7 d: b" _- D5 X% T) ~5 e7 w
) @3 ^4 i* m' l$ W X3 R3 s6 H7 Y+ C
7 u9 a( ?6 V) `- ?- ?5 p1 W
" b" i4 q# i0 c( ^8 R, C; r# A/ S. s, K. L+ _" F' F
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|