|
4 G$ A* C- b; i( j( i4 o$ a1 G- a' z' v: {/ v% N
| Identification
; k( N5 b; Z' T | 5.1.2. W- f- q5 O5 h& F s
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2. C" d% S) n. f* w3 d' J
|
7 S3 [# J% }: Q( a% ~8 Z: L' G. e' U" U7 @3 R L% W, Q
Standard:
; w* x0 N) z' {2 E# i' W$ wIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2 b! B( P, z6 l2 e. G) G' g
:1995
! K7 L5 s |. W- E3 o; ?: DSub clause:; T$ @% l' ~" o ]4 v$ w
5.1.2
% H: z1 [5 A- ^9 ?8 r; ?Sheet n. 362; {* F, [; a/ A3 u4 ^8 g8 ?3 V) o
Page 1(1)
" E4 U$ f ]( y8 v& r3 G- S! WSubject:8 F0 |+ _0 ^2 w- V* b. z. ^
Identification
1 U q7 ^" X0 O( a) h1 }5 WKey words:# |: @+ H& _5 C
- Manufacturer’s name
3 W7 h5 F+ ~; D- Trade mark6 {4 ?: o( d2 ^
- Agent/Supplier. U, Q3 ^( g: h% {6 W' t) k
Decision taken by; H' j% g& J9 R0 R6 H+ q
ETF3 and confirmed* @, Q$ l) X7 D& X
by CTL at its 38th6 ^2 r3 B Z0 a" b+ g
meeting, in Toronto! e9 O/ B1 k- z- ~% Y4 H
Question:& j( d2 l: ^% N8 {, \1 }, i* o
Manufacturer's name or registered trade mark. Is manufacturer's agent/supplier name- @9 }( d8 y0 B. J L
acceptable as an alternative for identification?
+ b' r5 t2 v7 z$ }' c, @Decision:* F2 B7 F+ \; k5 j6 N z' \) O2 M- ?
In the absence of a definition for “manufacturer” in IEC61010-1, it was decided that only0 S3 Y+ O0 `' s3 n
manufacturer’s name is acceptable under this sub-clause.9 O. ^/ h+ `- V8 B6 T; m
( u1 f [9 N. ]5 a! }4 ?. E
, |2 d% \( r6 ^% f/ T
$ r# S$ B2 G3 a6 A5 ~+ o3 ^8 { |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|