标题: 请教下关于这份关于待机模式的决议 [打印本页] 作者: xielien1010 时间: 2018-11-5 21:19 标题: 请教下关于这份关于待机模式的决议 这份决议看的我云里雾里。。。。请各位帮我解读下哦; ~9 u, Z6 i6 C8 C2 ~$ w 作者: plmijb 时间: 2018-11-6 08:14
将内容copy 下来贴上，大家帮你还要花金币下载来看？作者: 非常百事可乐 时间: 2018-11-6 18:00
观点同上楼。金币难赚作者: xielien1010 时间: 2018-11-6 19:46
决议内容 Question: 0 A$ `: B8 u6 Y b1 {+ B! m. BBased on the definition in 3.8.2 and taking into account that there is not always an 6 M) r( F& O6 O4 P5 {2 fstand-by position marked or identified in the appliance operation and there is a need to8 Y; e4 S" E- X, S9 p0 l
differentiate the "off" and "stand-by" circuits, at least in the test of 19.11.2 and 22.46 2 h- Y7 q( W( L& `& Ein the appliance in which 19.11.2 is applicable in stand –by mode according to the ; p8 [5 b3 u' l! u# b6 D( mrelevant parts 2.+ x/ g5 _! l0 G8 s5 V& u/ e* @7 U
We would like to know if the stand-by circuit include those parts that are energized " Y* h7 f3 i5 ] g! d# dwhen the appliance is in "0" position.' T$ [! m- E1 F# D1 ^% f: E
2 K0 G L# ^2 ^' C& r* S- H, e, GDecision:- C+ G) l( M9 _8 g8 M" e6 t7 q7 N4 J
In stand-by, only electronic components that are energized in any of their terminals are5 J/ O7 V1 ^# @. ~
susceptible to be short circuited according to a) to g) in 19.11.2. 2 E9 Z% S% \& G# n: p- O5 t. oIt was agreed that in terms of clause 19 the meaning of "off" correspond to circuits or 4 D8 g) V% M6 I" [( Jcomponents that are not energized in any of their terminals.作者: xielien1010 时间: 2018-11-6 19:47