|
, f' X; r! j0 f
* I8 A2 j G) t0 s% k2 _- N | Comparative tracking Index. A6 h) Y* s# @( G+ O1 O
| Tables in Annex D
5 g+ A; I1 a, e x9 B | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
8 t; ?2 d: w* g( k+ w, _4 T |
o4 p7 v+ X3 U7 @$ \. ^3 E9 u5 T _. |7 O2 {$ Y$ s2 H* Y( F! K
Standard:; h2 k# F$ m, ]. s+ [1 T: w: O2 o" u
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
" p1 a, s5 j& P:19953 M1 Q1 y1 \' V& f
Sub clause:
0 j& [; @' T2 Z9 l5 U% y# hTables in Annex D$ w" B* \% C- p& A9 { g* _
Sheet n. 369
- S; s. {2 g, `5 y* s! Y8 f. H9 cPage 1(1)
/ f) e% U; N2 x; I5 DSubject:
4 w" W* @8 A% }! F& ]3 }Comparative Tracking Index }* c! H2 [) s8 D$ {- x
Key words:
& L- t4 w. O, G- CTI values1 K* M% |, W7 ~, o `+ I
- Manufacturer’s claim
0 D6 ^2 h- d c5 wDecision taken by+ h$ d$ y" r- q) {8 i& Y6 i) M. i
ETF3 and confirmed
" T7 l: G( \9 fby CTL at its 38th9 ^; Z+ H H# n- }& z$ U) m4 I
meeting, in Toronto
. X/ ]% y) x1 e& }, J- t2 y; ~Questions :3 ?) L- z, |5 |0 o/ i
1. Is the manufacturer's declaration regarding the CTI values acceptable by Test Houses?6 F, @7 X* h5 q3 y% X; N
2.Is a single test for the CTI value acceptable?3 _5 q0 Q5 u6 g4 m3 m" c
3.Which CTI value is to be used when no value tested or declared, for example for PCB's?. ]1 n% O% L7 m# p
Decision:
, e; Q; H& j2 n# ]0 I; ?( N; M$ p1. The manufacturer’s claim is not adequate and must be backed by an independent test
5 q3 Y3 H) L+ ?8 u4 r* |# A1 i! Sreport/certificate from a recognised test house.
7 h& D3 G! @( f8 n+ Z2. No testing considered necessary if the material is approved and fit for purpose. However
7 H! Q% o E2 V1 V+ mif not approved than single test is not acceptable.
' X# p: z8 [# i. I3 @0 j3 S7 q3. The least favourable value, for example CTI value of < 100.
' }+ U% m- j6 I: ~5 [) `. C4 t4 y* O4 c
% P" H G. F$ x/ @+ ^) P& ]
# ?& o( l* s' W7 t# k1 r. U h |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|