|
* O `9 A! s1 s; e! w: p- {8 i
* }2 |5 r5 j7 N. B5 _1 cDSH 753$ G% Z* U p. \; _5 }6 S/ L
|
| Capacitor discharge voltage measurement
, D) T3 W0 q3 J& c( \, a: a | 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)
& q# ^$ b( V1 n1 T | 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7)- g) z! m6 [3 @2 |. P" X N; X" K0 h
|
9 q" a) q. Y. f, O+ k$ J7 h8 Q% \, L: b0 R
Standard(s): No. Year
" F3 M* S# X6 x: h) ?IEC60065/2001" i, Y9 B/ l: f9 g) v4 u" Z) |: \2 Z
IEC61010-1/20019 q' p0 f) E4 |9 z
2009 DSH 0753 TRON, MEASCategory: ; z$ |4 M4 f4 x3 C! Z1 V
9.1.6Subclause(s):
+ p0 J2 b9 O0 w' @- c, a6.10.3
& [' r$ f/ @5 O* a2 X: \! z3 j6 ~+ A( kDeveloped by:
! H! k1 a, s3 v0 XWG4, ETF2, ETF3
' v' d+ n" Y5 X$ g! V, YSubject:
# n$ M3 }9 A) J- q8 k" J. N4 {Capacitor discharge: u- u8 b) z, o; l1 k0 ^# P
voltage measurement
' A" {; G. t4 k8 m' S) wKey words:
! j% m/ [; q+ q4 ] P; C7 q3 N- Plug discharge
) K) I, D$ U A$ o! s" r- Capacitor discharge- e* c7 I1 e9 [2 \" e0 H; a4 W# z
- Shock hazard
( W5 X4 X! p w J, A( HApproved at the 47th CTL5 D0 g9 M. W8 r2 c0 ]* w, {
Plenary Meeting, year 2010
; Y4 ^: n2 M. a9 X& aQuestion:
' G# C6 z$ O/ h8 j4 d# @The standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor
; J% A+ O5 v: X! p) Idischarge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and1 g8 _: O5 @% @2 ~8 n" e( B: H
measuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of) N1 N: [0 v& y! _% H4 v7 h+ a
the referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time
/ o* q! P: q$ A( |, Q! Qspecified.7 j3 t$ E( w2 z" D, @5 }
(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but( ?0 \6 M, J+ e. f' j+ G
the intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the
& I" x8 l1 r% u- e5 Dadvent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in3 k K! {; \; G2 q0 H
the AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would) i% O# z$ ?2 Z+ W. p" m
result in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?
5 a# C) x% X3 s- p1 b/ `(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input( F7 d! q* T; d3 B' K, L6 _; M
impedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input" s( q5 g( x+ ~2 I! d9 B5 N! }
resistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more p$ X& k* ~# T# y
consistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?
0 H, g( |6 h% H4 V, q3 ^# BDecision:
5 H$ N: g/ `, z0 R/ e(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.6 A" |0 G+ c% [& _
(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within0 Z4 m4 a9 k: H/ Q
the CB Scheme.
2 z; U8 F- p4 p+ I0 r3 q1 e+ V* J w% D8 Q7 R: ^
7 |$ e) m# E2 c) u; h
1 ] h. y" [% Z$ y! ` |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|